H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Maria Elena Camerin vs Maria Vento-Kabchi H2H: 1-0
Maria Elena Camerin holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Vento-Kabchi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Elena Camerin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Elena Camerin won the 2004 Hobart fourth round 7-6(7) 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
VEN
Age 52
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2004* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Maria Elena Camerin | 7-6(7) 2-6 6-1 | Maria Vento-Kabchi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,666 | 97 | 147 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maria Vento-Kabchi | #996 | #26 | 1,053 | 1,716 | 95 | 156 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Elena Camerin | Maria Vento-Kabchi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #166 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #86 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #43 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #139 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #43 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #110 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #44 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #48 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |