H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Maria Elena Camerin vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 1-0

Maria Elena Camerin holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Elena Camerin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Elena Camerin won the 2007 Strasbourg Open round of 32 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Elena Camerin
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Elena Camerin #72 6-4 7-6(3) Nicole Pratt #44 Match data May 24, 2007* R32 Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Elena Camerin #817 #41 774 1,667 98 148 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Elena Camerin Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 2001 6–5 54.5% #112 1,546 0 0 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 2002 5–8 38.5% #123 1,524 0 0 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 2003 3–8 27.3% #100 1,494 0 0 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 2004 22–20 52.4% #43 1,663 0 0 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2005 11–22 33.3% #99 1,564 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0
24 2006 22–23 48.9% #50 1,610 0 0 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2007 9–18 33.3% #100 1,546 0 0 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2008 5–11 31.2% #104 1,512 0 0 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2009 5–14 26.3% #114 1,475 0 0 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0
28 2010 6–11 35.3% #111 1,495 0 0 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0
29 2011 1–4 20.0% #177 1,491 0 0 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2012 1–2 33.3% #168 1,499 0 0 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 2013 2–2 50.0% #192 1,519 0 0 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maria Elena Camerin Nicole Pratt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2004 16 11 27 59.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2005 9 13 22 40.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2006 16 13 29 55.2% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2008 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2009 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2010 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2013 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 62 71 133 46.6% 32 56 88 36.4% 4 19 23 17.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 104/222 of Maria Elena Camerin's and 48/157 of Nicole Pratt's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Maria Elena Camerin Nicole Pratt
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 3/11 1.0 3.3 66.3% 64.6% 48.8% 70.5% 43.5% 59.2% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 6/42 1.0 2.7 64.3% 55.2% 46.8% 52.7% 53.4% 51.8% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 3/33 0.3 2.3 66.0% 47.5% 32.0% 53.9% 44.4% 42.5% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 19/45 0.8 3.7 62.8% 58.0% 45.5% 50.8% 51.1% 53.2% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 19/27 0.7 5.8 60.3% 56.8% 40.9% 46.5% 50.0% 50.8% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 13/16 0.5 4.5 63.7% 54.4% 41.2% 36.3% 47.4% 49.5% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 17/19 0.7 4.3 61.7% 54.9% 39.8% 40.4% 51.9% 49.0% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 14/17 1.0 5.9 63.1% 54.9% 38.3% 36.0% 51.1% 48.7% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 5/5 0.6 7.4 57.0% 54.3% 32.2% 39.3% 42.9% 44.3% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 3/3 1.3 4.3 57.7% 58.0% 43.3% 62.4% 58.3% 51.6% 45.0% 2003 5/40 0.2 4.4 66.1% 58.7% 43.7% 50.3% 59.6% 53.4% 44.9%
31 2013 2/4 1.0 5.0 63.2% 53.6% 39.6% 56.1% 46.5% 48.6% 47.0% 2004 6/43 0.2 4.2 65.0% 59.4% 44.8% 55.7% 43.2% 54.1% 41.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/25 0.8 5.2 59.5% 65.7% 44.6% 56.6% 40.1% 57.3% 44.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 8/20 0.5 2.1 70.5% 55.5% 41.2% 46.6% 36.4% 51.0% 39.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 21/26 1.0 2.3 68.4% 57.3% 43.1% 36.6% 53.8% 53.1% 41.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/3 0.0 2.7 71.0% 48.8% 32.7% 31.1% 30.0% 44.7% 35.8%
Career — 104/246 0.8 4.7 62.2% 55.9% 41.2% 45.2% 50.0% 50.2% 42.9% — 48/378 0.6 3.1 67.3% 57.8% 42.6% 43.8% 47.3% 52.8% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maria Elena Camerin Nicole Pratt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50
19 2001 1546 108.1 — — — — — +58 — 56.0% +0.12 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.85 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66
20 2002 1525 104.8 — — — — +9 +20 — 35.7% -0.68 2–2 (50%) — — +0.88 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35
21 2003 1495 108.8 +1.20 -0.47 0.973 50.2% +30 -5 — 38.5% -0.62 0–4 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 95.3 +0.46 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51
22 2004 1663 123.4 -1.01 -0.43 0.934 48.6% +23 -138 -150 49.0% -0.09 9–3 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 107.2 -0.10 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06
23 2005 1564 109.3 -3.27 -1.94 0.669 41.3% +36 -101 -92 36.8% -0.65 4–6 (40%) 1–6 (14%) 94.3 +1.00 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
24 2006 1611 121.4 -1.81 -0.26 0.940 49.0% +12 -112 -120 49.5% -0.03 5–6 (45%) 2–2 (50%) 99.2 +0.09 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88
25 2007 1547 119.6 -2.46 -0.09 0.897 47.4% +36 -41 — 39.1% -0.94 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 97.9 -0.88 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10
26 2008 1513 107.2 -3.15 -3.06 0.768 44.3% +74 -63 — 39.5% -0.95 1–5 (17%) 2–0 — -0.17 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11
27 2009 1476 106.2 -4.26 +0.53 0.887 47.3% +48 -10 -46 33.3% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.07 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98
28 2010 1496 96.3 -4.40 -1.63 0.794 44.8% +59 -78 — 34.1% -1.44 5–2 (71%) — — +0.60 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74
29 2011 1492 104.5 -2.78 -0.88 0.774 43.8% — -65 — 27.3% -2.27 0–1 — — -0.65 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86
30 2012 1500 108.0 -0.75 +0.30 0.931 48.5% — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — -0.27 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96
31 2013 1520 103.4 -0.44 -2.36 0.915 47.9% — -33 — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 1–1 — -0.06 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45
Career — 1668 116.9 -2.74 -0.75 0.863 46.8% +31 -52 -105 41.9% -0.58 33–44 (43%) 18–20 (47%) 98.0 +0.68 — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.