H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Maria Elena Camerin holds a 1–0 lead over Rushmi Chakravarthi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Elena Camerin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Elena Camerin won the 2005 Kolkata round of 32 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Elena Camerin | 6-2 6-0 | Rushmi Chakravarthi | Match data | Sep 22, 2005* | R32 | Kolkata | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,667 | 98 | 148 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rushmi Chakravarthi | #1,212 | #310 | 74 | 1,500 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Elena Camerin | Rushmi Chakravarthi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #365 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #424 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Maria Elena Camerin | Rushmi Chakravarthi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 55.2% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 62 | 71 | 133 | 46.6% | 32 | 56 | 88 | 36.4% | 4 | 19 | 23 | 17.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Maria Elena Camerin | Rushmi Chakravarthi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 2001 | 1546 | 108.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +58 | — | 56.0% | +0.12 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 1525 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +20 | — | 35.7% | -0.68 | 2–2 (50%) | — | — | +0.88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 1495 | 108.8 | +1.20 | -0.47 | 0.973 | 50.2% | +30 | -5 | — | 38.5% | -0.62 | 0–4 (0%) | 2–1 (67%) | 95.3 | +0.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 1663 | 123.4 | -1.01 | -0.43 | 0.934 | 48.6% | +23 | -138 | -150 | 49.0% | -0.09 | 9–3 (75%) | 3–3 (50%) | 107.2 | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 1564 | 109.3 | -3.27 | -1.94 | 0.669 | 41.3% | +36 | -101 | -92 | 36.8% | -0.65 | 4–6 (40%) | 1–6 (14%) | 94.3 | +1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 1611 | 121.4 | -1.81 | -0.26 | 0.940 | 49.0% | +12 | -112 | -120 | 49.5% | -0.03 | 5–6 (45%) | 2–2 (50%) | 99.2 | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 1547 | 119.6 | -2.46 | -0.09 | 0.897 | 47.4% | +36 | -41 | — | 39.1% | -0.94 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–3 (57%) | 97.9 | -0.88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 1513 | 107.2 | -3.15 | -3.06 | 0.768 | 44.3% | +74 | -63 | — | 39.5% | -0.95 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–0 | — | -0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 1476 | 106.2 | -4.26 | +0.53 | 0.887 | 47.3% | +48 | -10 | -46 | 33.3% | -0.96 | 2–5 (29%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.07 | 2005 | 1486 | 94.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.03 |
| 28 | 2010 | 1496 | 96.3 | -4.40 | -1.63 | 0.794 | 44.8% | +59 | -78 | — | 34.1% | -1.44 | 5–2 (71%) | — | — | +0.60 | 2006 | 1462 | 94.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.25 | — | — | — | +0.03 |
| 29 | 2011 | 1492 | 104.5 | -2.78 | -0.88 | 0.774 | 43.8% | — | -65 | — | 27.3% | -2.27 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 1500 | 108.0 | -0.75 | +0.30 | 0.931 | 48.5% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.83 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 1520 | 103.4 | -0.44 | -2.36 | 0.915 | 47.9% | — | -33 | — | 50.0% | -0.30 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1668 | 116.9 | -2.74 | -0.75 | 0.863 | 46.8% | +31 | -52 | -105 | 41.9% | -0.58 | 33–44 (43%) | 18–20 (47%) | 98.0 | +0.68 | — | 1500 | 94.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +2.00 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 3, 2011 | H2H |
| Emilie Loit | 3 | 2 | 5 | Aug 27, 2008 | H2H |
| Dinara Safina | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 25, 2009 | H2H |
| Elena Dementieva | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 25, 2008 | H2H |
| Maria Kirilenko | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 27, 2008 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sania Mirza | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 21, 2006 | H2H |
| Melinda Czink | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 16, 2006 | H2H |
| Maria Elena Camerin | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 22, 2005 | H2H |