H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Elena Camerin vs Tatiana Poutchek H2H: 1-1
Maria Elena Camerin and Tatiana Poutchek are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tatiana Poutchek leads 1–0 on clay, while Maria Elena Camerin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Elena Camerin won the 2007 US Open first round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 47
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2007* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Maria Elena Camerin | 6-3 7-6(4) | Tatiana Poutchek | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2002* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tatiana Poutchek | 6-2 6-3 | Maria Elena Camerin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,666 | 97 | 147 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tatiana Poutchek | #1,078 | #55 | 609 | 1,626 | 51 | 101 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Elena Camerin | Tatiana Poutchek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #734 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #86 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #43 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #100 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #121 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #94 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |