H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 1-0
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez holds a 1–0 lead over Amélie Mauresmo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez won the 2009 Rome second round 4-6 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2009* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | Amélie Mauresmo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | #761 | #19 | 2,635 | 1,891 | 105 | 99 | 51.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Amélie Mauresmo | #21 | #1 | 4,992 | 2,217 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 2 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 25 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Amélie Mauresmo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #93 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #29 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #9 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,060 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 2006 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #4 | 2,061 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 56–11 | 83.6% | #2 | 2,175 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | 2008 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 53–16 | 76.8% | #3 | 2,127 | 0 | 19 |
| 26 | 2009 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,135 | 2 | 23 |
| 27 | 2010 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #18 | 1,960 | 2 | 24 |
| 28 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #35 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #24 | 1,815 | 2 | 24 |
| 29 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #162 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,871 | 2 | 25 |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #555 | 1,678 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |