H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 1-0

Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez holds a 1–0 lead over Amélie Mauresmo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez won the 2009 Italian Open first round 4-6 7-6(4) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez
Spain Age 44 Left-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #48 4-6 7-6(4) 6-2 Amélie Mauresmo #21 Match data May 5, 2009* R64 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #761 #19 2,635 1,894 107 101 51.4% 0 1 0 0 4 5
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,225 463 185 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,556 0 0
18 2001 10–16 38.5% #93 1,520 0 0 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,728 0 0
19 2002 0–4 0.0% #282 1,461 0 0 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,911 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2000 26–13 66.7% #16 1,906 0 2
21 — — — — — — — 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,022 0 6
22 — — — — — — — 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,061 0 8
23 2006 5–6 45.5% #106 1,488 0 0 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,065 0 10
24 2007 2–2 50.0% #174 1,506 0 0 2004 61–12 83.6% #2 2,178 0 15
25 2008 7–9 43.8% #93 1,556 0 0 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,133 0 19
26 2009 30–17 63.8% #26 1,781 0 2 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,165 2 23
27 2010 23–16 59.0% #28 1,806 0 3 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,972 2 24
28 2011 23–17 57.5% #35 1,818 0 5 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,820 2 24
29 2012 6–13 31.6% #162 1,677 0 5 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,873 2 25
30 2013 1–1 50.0% #555 1,668 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez Amélie Mauresmo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
18 2001 0 4 4 0.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 19 7 26 73.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 15 7 22 68.2% 16 3 19 84.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 25 5 30 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2003 23 11 34 67.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
24 2007 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 35 7 42 83.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2008 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2005 36 10 46 78.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2009 11 9 20 55.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 32 10 42 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2010 11 11 22 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2007 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2011 12 10 22 54.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 21 14 35 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 12 7 19 63.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 0 5 100.0%
30 2013 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 38 50 88 43.2% 61 41 102 59.8% 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — — 248 97 345 71.9% 118 46 164 72.0% 44 19 63 69.8% 53 23 76 69.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 148/178 of Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez's and 222/395 of Amélie Mauresmo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 2006 1/11 0.0 2.0 55.8% 31.0% 39.1% 53.3% 28.6% 34.6% 40.0% 2003 10/62 2.3 2.9 63.3% 73.3% 50.3% 41.3% 41.8% 65.2% 48.3%
24 2007 3/4 3.0 4.3 60.5% 58.4% 47.3% 54.9% 69.2% 53.3% 51.1% 2004 18/73 4.5 4.4 58.2% 74.6% 52.0% 54.6% 50.2% 65.2% 51.1%
25 2008 13/16 2.8 2.0 55.4% 65.0% 46.6% 60.2% 51.5% 57.0% 44.5% 2005 24/69 3.2 4.3 58.0% 72.7% 50.1% 57.2% 55.5% 63.0% 47.6%
26 2009 41/47 3.6 2.5 53.0% 68.2% 48.5% 56.6% 51.7% 59.1% 45.0% 2006 55/64 2.6 2.9 64.8% 68.0% 49.1% 60.4% 53.9% 61.2% 47.1%
27 2010 37/39 4.4 2.8 53.9% 69.4% 47.4% 58.5% 46.3% 59.1% 44.1% 2007 36/41 4.4 4.8 61.2% 69.9% 45.6% 56.1% 53.4% 60.6% 45.7%
28 2011 37/40 2.3 3.1 54.7% 66.0% 45.0% 50.5% 45.9% 56.7% 44.1% 2008 45/49 3.3 6.3 61.4% 67.4% 43.0% 56.0% 51.2% 57.9% 47.5%
29 2012 14/19 2.3 3.8 57.0% 57.8% 42.5% 47.2% 44.7% 51.4% 38.8% 2009 34/37 4.0 5.5 60.2% 67.0% 45.7% 55.9% 48.6% 58.9% 45.1%
30 2013 2/2 0.5 1.0 66.7% 59.3% 58.9% 50.0% 41.7% 59.0% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 148/208 3.2 2.8 54.6% 66.1% 46.7% 54.8% 48.3% 57.3% 44.0% — 222/648 3.5 4.6 61.5% 69.3% 47.2% 56.4% 51.8% 60.8% 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez Amélie Mauresmo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1488 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1523 102.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.20 1–1 — — +0.03
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1556 126.4 — — — — -24 +36 — 48.0% -0.08 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 -0.06
18 2001 1521 114.8 — — — — -18 +66 — 38.7% -0.92 6–6 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.35 1998 1729 146.0 — — — — -83 0 -114 51.2% +0.12 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 107.0 -0.59
19 2002 1462 95.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.36 1999 1912 159.1 — — — — -27 -138 — 61.2% +0.73 12–5 (71%) 5–5 (50%) 109.0 +1.67
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1907 163.5 — — — — -30 +17 — 64.6% +1.38 5–7 (42%) 4–7 (36%) 93.9 -1.71
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2023 167.1 — — — — -34 +99 -402 70.7% +1.41 14–3 (82%) 10–3 (77%) 113.0 -2.74
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2062 162.6 — — — — +32 -20 -255 74.0% +1.75 6–7 (46%) 10–5 (67%) 98.8 -0.13
23 2006 1489 110.8 -2.04 -2.00 0.612 37.3% -75 +135 — 46.2% +0.04 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.2 +0.19 2003 2065 163.0 +5.99 +3.35 1.388 56.1% +3 +92 — 69.4% +1.11 13–5 (72%) 13–2 (87%) 108.6 -2.28
24 2007 1506 110.3 -2.03 +0.86 1.092 52.3% — +140 — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 1–1 — -0.08 2004 2178 168.3 +7.28 +5.47 1.468 57.6% +1 +37 -262 78.5% +2.20 14–6 (70%) 8–5 (62%) 104.3 -0.48
25 2008 1556 123.2 +0.69 +0.59 1.033 50.5% -136 +102 +74 44.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 -0.04 2005 2133 167.1 +5.80 +3.65 1.286 55.4% +23 +95 -185 72.0% +1.48 10–6 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 102.5 -0.83
26 2009 1781 138.2 +3.43 +1.20 1.100 51.5% -175 +81 — 60.9% +0.45 11–10 (52%) 6–3 (67%) 106.6 +0.37 2006 2166 170.3 +5.44 +4.78 1.215 54.1% +18 +5 -62 70.5% +1.49 15–4 (79%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 -3.85
27 2010 1807 143.6 +3.06 +1.20 1.078 51.4% -128 +98 -159 55.7% +0.42 7–7 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 101.9 -1.22 2007 1973 149.7 +4.23 +2.32 1.159 53.0% +81 +133 +141 63.4% +1.04 6–9 (40%) 6–8 (43%) 89.6 -1.04
28 2011 1819 139.3 +0.93 +0.43 1.019 50.2% -71 +47 -121 57.3% +0.43 4–5 (44%) 9–4 (69%) 103.5 -1.02 2008 1820 135.6 +2.15 +2.79 1.128 52.5% +25 +198 +234 56.9% +0.66 14–8 (64%) 8–9 (47%) 94.5 +0.52
29 2012 1677 115.8 -1.76 -1.58 0.798 45.1% -13 +152 -9 37.2% -0.95 1–6 (14%) — — -0.84 2009 1873 146.4 +3.25 +2.00 1.095 52.0% +15 +92 +120 61.4% +0.83 12–4 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -1.60
30 2013 1669 99.6 -1.32 -1.04 1.045 51.4% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1630 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1583 96.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1895 134.8 +1.77 +0.63 1.030 50.4% -104 +88 -60 51.1% 0.00 34–43 (44%) 25–20 (56%) 102.4 -1.26 — 2226 166.5 +4.45 +3.42 1.200 53.8% +5 +46 -86 66.9% +1.23 128–73 (64%) 90–60 (60%) 108.0 -2.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.