H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez vs Daniela Hantuchova H2H: 2-0
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez holds a 2–0 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez won the 2011 Toronto third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 43
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2011 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | 7-5 6-2 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2011* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | 6-2 6-4 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | #761 | #19 | 2,635 | 1,891 | 105 | 99 | 51.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Daniela Hantuchova | #317 | #5 | 2,897 | 1,968 | 457 | 361 | 55.9% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Daniela Hantuchova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #93 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #19 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,930 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2008 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #21 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2009 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2010 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #35 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #24 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #162 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #555 | 1,678 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #62 | 1,577 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #83 | 1,574 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #228 | 1,514 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,524 | 0 | 7 |