H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez vs Serena Williams H2H: 0-4

Serena Williams holds a 4–0 lead over Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2012 US Open second round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez
ESP Age 43 Left-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 30, 2012* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Serena Williams #4 6-2 6-4 Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #108 Match data
Jan 15, 2010* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Serena Williams #1 6-1 6-2 Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #25 Match data
Sep 6, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Serena Williams #2 6-3 7-5 Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #43 Match data
May 30, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Serena Williams #2 4-6 6-3 6-4 Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #761 #19 2,635 1,891 105 99 51.5% 0 1 0 0 4 5
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 2001 10–16 38.5% #93 1,520 0 0 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2002 0–4 0.0% #282 1,461 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 — — — — — — — 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 — — — — — — — 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 — — — — — — — 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2006 5–6 45.5% #106 1,488 0 0 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2007 2–2 50.0% #174 1,505 0 0 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2008 6–8 42.9% #93 1,542 0 0 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2009 30–17 63.8% #26 1,778 0 2 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2010 23–16 59.0% #28 1,804 0 3 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2011 23–17 57.5% #35 1,817 0 5 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2012 5–12 29.4% #162 1,687 0 5 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2013 1–1 50.0% #555 1,678 0 5 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 — — — — — — — 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 — — — — — — — 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 — — — — — — — 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 — — — — — — — 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 — — — — — — — 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 — — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 — — — — — — — 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71