H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez vs Shahar Peer H2H: 3-1

Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez holds a 3–1 lead over Shahar Peer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez won the 2011 Beijing second round 6-1 7-5.

ESP Age 43 Left-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 5, 2011* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #33 6-1 7-5 Shahar Peer #27 Match data
Jun 16, 2011* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #72 7-5 6-3 Shahar Peer #22 Match data
May 24, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #86 7-6(4) 6-1 Shahar Peer #20 Match data
Feb 16, 2011* Dubai WTA 1000 R64 Hard Shahar Peer #11 6-4 6-1 Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez #761 #19 2,635 1,891 105 99 51.5% 0 1 0 0 4 5
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,966 268 204 56.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez Shahar Peer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,509 0 0
18 2001 10–16 38.5% #93 1,520 0 0 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,636 0 0
19 2002 0–4 0.0% #282 1,461 0 0 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,826 0 3
20 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,830 0 3
21 2008 24–20 54.5% #38 1,707 0 3
22 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,787 0 5
23 2006 5–6 45.5% #106 1,488 0 0 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,885 0 5
24 2007 2–2 50.0% #174 1,505 0 0 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,706 0 5
25 2008 6–8 42.9% #93 1,542 0 0 2012 15–22 40.5% #74 1,584 0 5
26 2009 30–17 63.8% #26 1,778 0 2 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,558 0 5
27 2010 23–16 59.0% #28 1,804 0 3 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5
28 2011 23–17 57.5% #35 1,817 0 5 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,526 0 5
29 2012 5–12 29.4% #162 1,687 0 5
30 2013 1–1 50.0% #555 1,678 0 5