H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Maria Sakkari vs Julia Goerges H2H: 1-3
Julia Goerges holds a 3–1 lead over Maria Sakkari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Julia Goerges leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Sakkari won the 2020 Doha second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GRE
Age 30
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2020* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Maria Sakkari | 6-4 6-3 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
| Jan 31, 2019* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-2 7-5 | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2018* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Julia Goerges | 6-4 6-4 | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
| Feb 1, 2018* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-2 7-6(5) | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2016 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Maria Sakkari | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sakkari | #37 | #3 | 5,085 | 2,033 | 258 | 205 | 55.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Maria Sakkari | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #98 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #22 | 1,881 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #6 | 1,917 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #32 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2026 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #37 | 1,812 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |