H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Maria Sharapova vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-1

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Sharapova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 2010 Tokyo second round 7-5 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Sharapova
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 29, 2010* Tokyo WTA 1000 R64 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 7-5 3-6 6-3 Maria Sharapova #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Maria Sharapova #373 #1 10,690 2,238 596 174 77.4% 5 14 1 9 7 36
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Sharapova Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 1–2 33.3% #188 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2003 24–12 66.7% #32 1,779 0 2 — — — — — — —
17 2004 55–16 77.5% #4 2,063 1 7 — — — — — — —
18 2005 53–13 80.3% #4 2,068 1 10 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 2006 59–10 85.5% #2 2,210 2 15 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 2007 40–12 76.9% #5 2,113 2 16 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 2008 31–6 83.8% #9 2,098 3 19 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 2009 31–9 77.5% #14 2,050 3 20 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 2010 33–11 75.0% #18 1,981 3 22 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2011 43–13 76.8% #4 1,993 3 24 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2012 55–10 84.6% #2 2,155 4 27 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2013 37–8 82.2% #4 2,136 4 29 — — — — — — —
27 2014 50–13 79.4% #2 2,093 5 33 — — — — — — —
28 2015 35–10 77.8% #4 2,044 5 35 — — — — — — —
29 2016 4–1 80.0% #91 2,049 5 35 — — — — — — —
30 2017 16–7 69.6% #61 1,976 5 36 — — — — — — —
31 2018 21–11 65.6% #29 1,929 5 36 — — — — — — —
32 2019 8–8 50.0% #133 1,858 5 36 — — — — — — —
33 2020 0–2 0.0% #373 1,820 5 36 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8