H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira vs Penny Moor H2H: 1-1
Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira and Penny Moor are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira leads 1–0 on clay, while Penny Moor leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira won the 1974 Roland Garros second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 1974* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira | 6-2 6-2 | Penny Moor | Match data |
| May 31, 1973* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Penny Moor | 6-3 6-0 | Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira | — | — | — | 1,565 | 27 | 37 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Penny Moor | — | — | — | 1,552 | 53 | 111 | 32.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira | Penny Moor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 9–20 | 31.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1975 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 7–21 | 25.0% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1976 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1978 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1980 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1981 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,395 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |