H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mariana Duque-Mariño vs Edina Gallovits Hall H2H: 0-1
Edina Gallovits Hall holds a 1–0 lead over Mariana Duque-Mariño in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Edina Gallovits Hall leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Edina Gallovits Hall won the 2012 Bogota quarterfinal 7-6(3) 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 41
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2012* | Bogota | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Edina Gallovits Hall | 7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 | Mariana Duque-Mariño | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mariana Duque-Mariño | #709 | #66 | 923 | 1,657 | 48 | 82 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Edina Gallovits Hall | — | — | — | 1,642 | 50 | 80 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mariana Duque-Mariño | Edina Gallovits Hall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #109 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #192 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,453 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,439 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #145 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,483 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,454 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #78 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #110 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #107 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |