H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 1-0
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 1–0 lead over Kathy Horvath in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1988 Dallas third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1988* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-4 6-1 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |