H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marilyn Tesch vs Barbara Hawcroft H2H: 1-1
Marilyn Tesch and Barbara Hawcroft are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbara Hawcroft leads 1–0 on clay, while Marilyn Tesch leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marilyn Tesch won the 1972 Adelaide 1 quarterfinal 3-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 1972* | Adelaide 1 | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Marilyn Tesch | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Barbara Hawcroft | Match data |
| Dec 5, 1971* | Gympie | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Barbara Hawcroft | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | Marilyn Tesch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marilyn Tesch | — | — | — | 1,599 | 26 | 42 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Barbara Hawcroft | — | — | — | 1,727 | 63 | 53 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marilyn Tesch | Barbara Hawcroft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| -4 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -3 | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -2 | 1970 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| -1 | 1971 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 0 | 1972 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1 | 1973 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2 | 1974 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 5 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 28–21 | 57.1% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 29–21 | 58.0% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |