H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Marina Erakovic holds a 1–0 lead over Amber Liu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marina Erakovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marina Erakovic won the 2008 Memphis round of 16 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marina Erakovic | 7-5 6-3 | Amber Liu | Match data | Feb 29, 2008* | R16 | Memphis | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marina Erakovic | #827 | #39 | 1,392 | 1,695 | 104 | 133 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Amber Liu | #1,089 | #241 | 111 | 1,503 | 2 | 10 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marina Erakovic | Amber Liu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #258 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #607 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #66 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #227 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #583 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #333 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #477 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #66 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #106 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #197 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Marina Erakovic | Amber Liu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2005 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 60 | 83 | 143 | 42.0% | 20 | 28 | 48 | 41.7% | 24 | 21 | 45 | 53.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | 2 | 10 | 12 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 219/235 of Marina Erakovic's and 5/10 of Amber Liu's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Marina Erakovic | Amber Liu | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1/3 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 64.8% | 51.4% | 47.4% | 33.3% | 25.0% | 50.0% | 23.9% |
| 19 | 2007 | 5/6 | 2.4 | 3.6 | 56.9% | 62.4% | 42.7% | 39.4% | 61.3% | 54.4% | 41.8% | 2004 | 1/3 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 54.7% | 63.4% | 44.1% | 33.3% | 30.0% | 54.7% | 40.3% |
| 20 | 2008 | 29/33 | 5.4 | 3.4 | 58.8% | 68.1% | 47.4% | 54.2% | 45.7% | 59.3% | 40.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 11/11 | 3.8 | 4.9 | 57.0% | 64.8% | 38.5% | 56.9% | 55.6% | 53.7% | 40.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 9/9 | 4.7 | 4.1 | 61.1% | 62.6% | 41.2% | 53.6% | 51.8% | 54.2% | 37.6% | 2007 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 59.8% | 62.1% | 30.8% | 38.5% | 35.7% | 49.5% | 40.5% |
| 23 | 2011 | 18/19 | 4.4 | 3.1 | 63.9% | 65.5% | 44.4% | 59.2% | 39.3% | 58.1% | 42.5% | 2008 | 2/3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 62.7% | 48.0% | 49.5% | 54.2% | 62.5% | 49.2% | 34.4% |
| 24 | 2012 | 38/40 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 54.4% | 68.8% | 46.5% | 53.9% | 42.7% | 58.3% | 42.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 29/36 | 4.2 | 4.9 | 57.0% | 70.7% | 45.0% | 51.7% | 47.3% | 59.7% | 44.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 31/32 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 60.3% | 65.6% | 42.5% | 49.3% | 46.9% | 56.3% | 41.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 21/21 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 61.0% | 66.3% | 50.9% | 53.1% | 41.0% | 60.4% | 38.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 18/18 | 2.3 | 4.4 | 64.7% | 61.7% | 44.5% | 51.8% | 50.1% | 56.1% | 43.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 10/10 | 2.0 | 5.6 | 57.0% | 65.1% | 39.1% | 48.2% | 43.8% | 54.1% | 36.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 219/237 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 59.0% | 66.6% | 44.9% | 52.7% | 46.0% | 57.7% | 41.4% | — | 5/12 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 60.9% | 54.6% | 44.3% | 42.7% | 43.1% | 50.5% | 34.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Marina Erakovic | Amber Liu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1483 | 96.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.23 |
| 17 | 2005 | 1498 | 95.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1502 | 121.7 | +5.20 | +3.79 | 0.478 | 38.0% | +30 | — | — | 28.6% | -2.00 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.28 |
| 19 | 2007 | 1457 | 98.0 | -0.61 | -2.50 | 0.916 | 48.2% | +5 | — | — | 21.4% | -1.36 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.10 | 2004 | 1469 | 99.2 | +0.78 | -1.05 | 0.888 | 47.4% | +16 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.88 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.24 |
| 20 | 2008 | 1518 | 119.1 | +1.94 | -2.96 | 1.003 | 49.8% | -43 | +12 | +208 | 48.7% | -0.08 | 6–6 (50%) | 5–7 (42%) | 99.1 | +1.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 1514 | 108.9 | -1.10 | -1.98 | 0.869 | 47.5% | -38 | — | — | 42.3% | -0.92 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–0 | — | -0.07 | 2006 | 1464 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.05 |
| 22 | 2010 | 1480 | 102.7 | -1.18 | -3.79 | 0.820 | 45.9% | -44 | — | +254 | 25.0% | -1.70 | 1–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.06 | 2007 | 1456 | 103.0 | -0.34 | -3.00 | 0.801 | 45.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.06 |
| 23 | 2011 | 1627 | 118.5 | +1.72 | -1.34 | 1.015 | 50.1% | -74 | — | +125 | 55.3% | +0.02 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–0 | — | +0.24 | 2008 | 1458 | 99.8 | -2.62 | -0.84 | 0.676 | 42.7% | +5 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | — | — | — | +0.12 |
| 24 | 2012 | 1584 | 114.0 | +1.58 | -1.34 | 1.023 | 50.5% | -11 | -33 | +124 | 44.0% | -0.37 | 9–6 (60%) | 5–3 (63%) | 104.2 | +1.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 1670 | 123.7 | +2.86 | -0.04 | 1.101 | 51.9% | -29 | -101 | +64 | 53.0% | +0.21 | 7–7 (50%) | 10–4 (71%) | 106.7 | +0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 1608 | 123.2 | -0.48 | -1.04 | 0.958 | 49.3% | +12 | -33 | +39 | 40.8% | -0.31 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 1542 | 117.9 | +1.24 | -2.64 | 0.961 | 48.9% | +77 | -39 | +69 | 44.7% | -0.23 | 2–7 (22%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.1 | -0.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 1620 | 110.9 | +0.21 | -1.18 | 0.978 | 49.7% | -22 | +11 | +15 | 48.7% | -0.26 | 4–3 (57%) | 5–4 (56%) | 102.4 | +0.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 1548 | 105.9 | -0.90 | -2.01 | 0.788 | 45.4% | +27 | — | — | 15.8% | -1.84 | 0–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1696 | 119.6 | +0.96 | -1.64 | 0.979 | 49.6% | -14 | -29 | +123 | 44.6% | -0.34 | 41–44 (48%) | 31–29 (52%) | 102.9 | +1.32 | — | 1503 | 108.5 | +0.08 | -0.39 | 0.701 | 43.2% | +17 | — | — | 27.6% | -2.04 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–1 | — | +2.67 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniela Hantuchova | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jun 18, 2015 | H2H |
| Ayumi Morita | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jun 26, 2013 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 26, 2015 | H2H |
| Barbora Strycova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jan 8, 2015 | H2H |
| Sara Errani | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 18, 2014 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eleni Daniilidou | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 26, 2007 | H2H |
| Kim Clijsters | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 27, 2003 | H2H |
| Patty Schnyder | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 17, 2008 | H2H |
| Marina Erakovic | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 29, 2008 | H2H |
| Yuliana Fedak | 1 | 0 | 1 | Feb 28, 2008 | H2H |