H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marina Erakovic vs Anne Keothavong H2H: 2-1
Marina Erakovic holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Keothavong in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marina Erakovic leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marina Erakovic won the 2012 Dallas third round 6-1 5-7 7-6(9).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 38
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2012* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marina Erakovic | 6-1 5-7 7-6(9) | Anne Keothavong | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2012* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Marina Erakovic | 6-4 6-0 | Anne Keothavong | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2009* | Memphis | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Anne Keothavong | 6-2 1-6 6-2 | Marina Erakovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marina Erakovic | #827 | #39 | 1,392 | 1,701 | 105 | 131 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anne Keothavong | #287 | #48 | 1,315 | 1,633 | 48 | 89 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marina Erakovic | Anne Keothavong | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #180 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #227 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #236 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #333 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #66 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #60 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #100 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #121 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #106 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #143 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #197 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |