H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marina Erakovic vs Stéphanie Dubois H2H: 2-0
Marina Erakovic holds a 2–0 lead over Stéphanie Dubois in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marina Erakovic leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marina Erakovic won the 2013 Auckland third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 38
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 39
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2013* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marina Erakovic | 6-2 6-1 | Stéphanie Dubois | Match data |
| Jun 11, 2008* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Marina Erakovic | 6-4 6-4 | Stéphanie Dubois | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marina Erakovic | #827 | #39 | 1,392 | 1,701 | 105 | 131 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Stéphanie Dubois | #352 | #87 | 757 | 1,569 | 23 | 61 | 27.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marina Erakovic | Stéphanie Dubois | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #225 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #227 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #333 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #105 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #156 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #66 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #46 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #140 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,393 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,381 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #106 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #197 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |