H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Marina Erakovic vs Sybille Bammer H2H: 0-1

Sybille Bammer holds a 1–0 lead over Marina Erakovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sybille Bammer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sybille Bammer won the 2010 Pattaya Open first round 7-6(8) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marina Erakovic
New Zealand Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sybille Bammer
AUT Age 46 Left-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sybille Bammer #50 7-6(8) 7-5 Marina Erakovic #360 Match data Feb 11, 2010* R32 Pattaya Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marina Erakovic — #39 1,392 1,695 104 133 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sybille Bammer — #19 2,014 1,845 133 141 48.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marina Erakovic Sybille Bammer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2005 1–1 50.0% #213 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2007 1–5 16.7% #153 1,457 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2008 16–17 48.5% #66 1,517 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,487 0 0
21 2009 4–7 36.4% #227 1,514 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2010 2–7 22.2% #333 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2011 11–8 57.9% #61 1,627 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #148 1,474 0 0
24 2012 19–21 47.5% #66 1,583 0 0 2004 0–4 0.0% #175 1,441 0 0
25 2013 20–16 55.6% #46 1,670 0 1 2005 5–7 41.7% #77 1,491 0 0
26 2014 12–20 37.5% #76 1,607 0 1 2006 19–26 42.2% #49 1,567 0 0
27 2015 7–14 33.3% #135 1,542 0 1 2007 43–25 63.2% #19 1,780 0 1
28 2016 10–8 55.6% #106 1,620 0 1 2008 27–25 51.9% #26 1,717 0 1
29 2017 1–9 10.0% #197 1,547 0 1 2009 21–23 47.7% #54 1,671 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2010 15–19 44.1% #68 1,649 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2011 3–9 25.0% — 1,570 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marina Erakovic Sybille Bammer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2009 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 13 10 23 56.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2005 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 14 20 34 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2007 29 17 46 63.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2008 22 18 40 55.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2017 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 60 83 143 42.0% 20 28 48 41.7% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — 94 98 192 49.0% 30 32 62 48.4% 9 11 20 45.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 219/235 of Marina Erakovic's and 198/267 of Sybille Bammer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marina Erakovic Sybille Bammer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2007 5/6 2.4 3.6 56.9% 62.4% 42.7% 39.4% 61.3% 54.4% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 29/33 5.4 3.4 58.8% 68.1% 47.4% 54.2% 45.7% 59.3% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 11/11 3.8 4.9 57.0% 64.8% 38.5% 56.9% 55.6% 53.7% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 9/9 4.7 4.1 61.1% 62.6% 41.2% 53.6% 51.8% 54.2% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 18/19 4.4 3.1 63.9% 65.5% 44.4% 59.2% 39.3% 58.1% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 38/40 3.8 3.4 54.4% 68.8% 46.5% 53.9% 42.7% 58.3% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 29/36 4.2 4.9 57.0% 70.7% 45.0% 51.7% 47.3% 59.7% 44.4% 2005 1/12 2.0 5.0 56.3% 52.4% 44.9% 46.2% 35.3% 49.1% 46.3%
26 2014 31/32 2.8 3.8 60.3% 65.6% 42.5% 49.3% 46.9% 56.3% 41.9% 2006 22/45 0.8 2.6 66.6% 57.9% 46.9% 47.3% 52.4% 53.5% 39.8%
27 2015 21/21 3.8 3.6 61.0% 66.3% 50.9% 53.1% 41.0% 60.4% 38.0% 2007 56/68 1.3 2.5 66.4% 63.7% 52.1% 57.0% 52.8% 60.1% 47.2%
28 2016 18/18 2.3 4.4 64.7% 61.7% 44.5% 51.8% 50.1% 56.1% 43.0% 2008 37/52 1.3 3.0 66.9% 57.4% 47.7% 51.5% 47.9% 53.8% 45.0%
29 2017 10/10 2.0 5.6 57.0% 65.1% 39.1% 48.2% 43.8% 54.1% 36.1% 2009 39/44 1.1 3.8 68.8% 58.1% 45.5% 54.4% 46.5% 54.3% 44.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 31/34 1.2 4.1 68.9% 58.1% 42.5% 49.1% 51.1% 53.7% 43.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 12/12 0.7 3.7 64.1% 53.4% 42.9% 45.9% 45.2% 49.6% 41.0%
Career — 219/237 3.8 3.9 59.0% 66.6% 44.9% 52.7% 46.0% 57.7% 41.4% — 198/274 1.1 3.2 67.2% 59.2% 47.3% 52.4% 49.8% 55.3% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marina Erakovic Sybille Bammer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2005 1498 95.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1457 98.0 -0.61 -2.50 0.916 48.2% +4 — — 21.4% -1.36 1–1 — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1518 119.1 +1.94 -2.96 1.003 49.8% -44 +13 +209 48.7% -0.08 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 +1.05 2000 1487 99.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.01
21 2009 1515 109.0 -1.10 -1.98 0.869 47.5% -39 — — 42.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1481 102.8 -1.18 -3.79 0.820 45.9% -45 — +253 25.0% -1.70 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 1628 118.5 +1.72 -1.34 1.015 50.1% -75 — +125 55.3% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 1–0 — +0.25 2003 1474 103.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.17
24 2012 1584 114.0 +1.58 -1.34 1.023 50.5% -11 -32 +125 44.0% -0.37 9–6 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.2 +1.89 2004 1441 105.9 — — — — +35 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.03
25 2013 1670 123.7 +2.86 -0.04 1.101 51.9% -28 -101 +64 53.0% +0.21 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.7 +0.26 2005 1492 115.8 -0.71 -0.20 0.911 47.7% +24 — — 50.0% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 +0.20
26 2014 1608 123.2 -0.48 -1.04 0.958 49.3% +12 -33 +40 40.8% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.33 2006 1568 125.9 -2.07 -2.76 0.856 47.0% -26 -35 +78 45.1% -0.47 6–10 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 -0.24
27 2015 1543 117.9 +1.24 -2.64 0.961 48.9% +76 -40 +68 44.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 -0.36 2007 1780 148.4 +3.79 +3.03 1.182 53.4% -40 -62 -94 62.9% +0.93 6–11 (35%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +1.08
28 2016 1620 110.9 +0.21 -1.18 0.978 49.7% -22 +11 +15 48.7% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 102.4 +0.55 2008 1718 130.0 -1.29 +1.00 0.973 49.3% +25 -53 -79 51.2% -0.20 10–11 (48%) 6–5 (55%) 97.7 +4.05
29 2017 1548 105.9 -0.90 -2.01 0.788 45.4% +27 — — 15.8% -1.84 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.44 2009 1672 130.5 -0.57 +0.29 0.966 49.1% +6 +36 -61 49.5% -0.11 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) 102.8 +0.50
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1649 124.4 -1.43 -0.06 0.939 48.6% +29 -15 -62 43.6% -0.38 6–4 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.7 -0.29
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1571 105.8 -3.05 -1.68 0.813 45.3% +73 +17 — 27.6% -1.59 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 -0.29
Career — 1696 119.6 +0.96 -1.64 0.979 49.6% -14 -29 +123 44.6% -0.34 41–44 (48%) 31–29 (52%) 102.9 +1.34 — 1845 135.5 +0.08 +0.68 0.994 49.8% 0 -21 -53 49.8% -0.09 39–51 (43%) 25–27 (48%) 97.2 +1.79

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.