H2H data updated: 2026-11-02 00:00 UTC

Marina Erakovic vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 1-0

Marina Erakovic holds a 1–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marina Erakovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marina Erakovic won the 2008 Roland Garros first round 6-7(9) 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marina Erakovic
New Zealand Age 38 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marina Erakovic #80 6-7(9) 6-3 6-3 Tathiana Garbin #56 Match data May 27, 2008* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marina Erakovic — #39 1,392 1,695 104 133 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tathiana Garbin — #22 1,255 1,741 171 210 44.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marina Erakovic Tathiana Garbin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2005 1–1 50.0% #213 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2007 1–5 16.7% #153 1,457 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2008 16–17 48.5% #66 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2009 4–7 36.4% #227 1,514 0 0 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0
22 2010 2–7 22.2% #333 1,480 0 0 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0
23 2011 11–8 57.9% #61 1,627 0 0 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1
24 2012 19–21 47.5% #66 1,583 0 0 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1
25 2013 20–16 55.6% #46 1,670 0 1 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1
26 2014 12–20 37.5% #76 1,607 0 1 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1
27 2015 7–14 33.3% #135 1,542 0 1 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1
28 2016 10–8 55.6% #106 1,620 0 1 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1
29 2017 1–9 10.0% #197 1,547 0 1 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2007 23–17 57.5% #36 1,670 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,567 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,608 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,580 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% — 1,574 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marina Erakovic Tathiana Garbin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 8 11 19 42.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2010 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2011 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2013 13 10 23 56.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2017 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 10 7 17 58.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 83 143 42.0% 20 28 48 41.7% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — 73 101 174 42.0% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 219/235 of Marina Erakovic's and 128/252 of Tathiana Garbin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marina Erakovic Tathiana Garbin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2007 5/6 2.4 3.6 56.9% 62.4% 42.7% 39.4% 61.3% 54.4% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 29/33 5.4 3.4 58.8% 68.1% 47.4% 54.2% 45.7% 59.3% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 11/11 3.8 4.9 57.0% 64.8% 38.5% 56.9% 55.6% 53.7% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 9/9 4.7 4.1 61.1% 62.6% 41.2% 53.6% 51.8% 54.2% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2011 18/19 4.4 3.1 63.9% 65.5% 44.4% 59.2% 39.3% 58.1% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2012 38/40 3.8 3.4 54.4% 68.8% 46.5% 53.9% 42.7% 58.3% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 29/36 4.2 4.9 57.0% 70.7% 45.0% 51.7% 47.3% 59.7% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2014 31/32 2.8 3.8 60.3% 65.6% 42.5% 49.3% 46.9% 56.3% 41.9% 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0%
27 2015 21/21 3.8 3.6 61.0% 66.3% 50.9% 53.1% 41.0% 60.4% 38.0% 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4%
28 2016 18/18 2.3 4.4 64.7% 61.7% 44.5% 51.8% 50.1% 56.1% 43.0% 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9%
29 2017 10/10 2.0 5.6 57.0% 65.1% 39.1% 48.2% 43.8% 54.1% 36.1% 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 25/40 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5%
Career — 219/237 3.8 3.9 59.0% 66.6% 44.9% 52.7% 46.0% 57.7% 41.4% — 128/381 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.4% 53.0% 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marina Erakovic Tathiana Garbin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2005 1498 95.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1457 98.0 -0.61 -2.50 0.916 48.2% +4 — — 21.4% -1.36 1–1 — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1518 119.1 +1.94 -2.96 1.003 49.8% -44 +13 +209 48.7% -0.08 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.1 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1515 109.0 -1.10 -1.98 0.869 47.5% -39 — — 42.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.07 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11
22 2010 1481 102.8 -1.18 -3.79 0.820 45.9% -45 — +253 25.0% -1.70 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.06 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10
23 2011 1628 118.5 +1.72 -1.34 1.015 50.1% -75 — +125 55.3% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 1–0 — +0.25 2000 1620 130.4 — — — — -94 +73 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40
24 2012 1584 114.0 +1.58 -1.34 1.023 50.5% -11 -32 +125 44.0% -0.37 9–6 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 104.2 +1.89 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37
25 2013 1670 123.7 +2.86 -0.04 1.101 51.9% -28 -101 +64 53.0% +0.21 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.7 +0.26 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83
26 2014 1608 123.2 -0.48 -1.04 0.958 49.3% +12 -33 +40 40.8% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.33 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.93
27 2015 1543 117.9 +1.24 -2.64 0.961 48.9% +76 -40 +68 44.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 -0.36 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03
28 2016 1620 111.3 +0.21 -1.18 0.978 49.7% -22 +11 +15 48.7% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 102.4 +0.55 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08
29 2017 1548 105.9 -0.90 -2.01 0.788 45.4% +27 — — 15.8% -1.84 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.44 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1670 125.7 -1.15 -0.11 0.977 49.1% -47 +107 -199 57.5% +0.45 6–2 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 106.3 +2.40
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1568 113.7 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +55 +60 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.6 -0.17
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1608 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -20 +74 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 -0.47
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1580 121.1 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +27 +33 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -1.97
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1574 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20
Career — 1696 119.7 +0.96 -1.64 0.979 49.6% -14 -29 +123 44.6% -0.34 41–44 (48%) 31–29 (52%) 102.9 +1.34 — 1742 125.6 -1.67 -0.77 0.912 48.0% -20 +77 -199 46.8% -0.25 53–60 (47%) 42–36 (54%) 102.3 +0.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.