H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Marion Bartoli vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 1-4

Amélie Mauresmo holds a 4–1 lead over Marion Bartoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marion Bartoli won the 2009 Brisbane semifinal 4-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marion Bartoli
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Amélie Mauresmo
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 10, 2009* Brisbane WTA 500 SF Hard Marion Bartoli #17 4-0 (ret.) Amélie Mauresmo #23 Match data
May 26, 2007* Strasbourg WTA 500 SF Clay Amélie Mauresmo #5 6-3 6-7(1) 6-3 Marion Bartoli #21 Match data
Mar 23, 2006* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #1 6-4 6-0 Marion Bartoli #32 Match data
Mar 3, 2006* Doha WTA 500 R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-0 6-2 Marion Bartoli #31 Match data
Jun 16, 2003 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R32 Grass Amélie Mauresmo #6 1-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Marion Bartoli #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marion Bartoli #13 #7 5,160 1,996 402 267 60.1% 1 0 0 5 2 8
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marion Bartoli Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #307 1,483 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 2002 2–3 40.0% #104 1,511 0 0 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0
18 2003 20–21 48.8% #58 1,643 0 0 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0
19 2004 26–23 53.1% #41 1,666 0 0 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
20 2005 26–25 51.0% #37 1,632 0 0 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #18 1,800 0 3 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 2007 47–31 60.3% #10 1,873 0 3 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
23 2008 30–26 53.6% #17 1,809 0 3 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2009 46–22 67.6% #11 1,882 0 5 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2010 36–21 63.2% #16 1,820 0 5 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 2011 60–26 69.8% #9 1,907 0 7 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 2012 41–25 62.1% #11 1,814 0 7 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 2013 23–15 60.5% #13 1,808 1 8 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 — — — — — — — 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25