H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Marion Bartoli vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 0-1
Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 1–0 lead over Marion Bartoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2006 Eastbourne third round 2-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2006* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | Marion Bartoli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | #13 | #7 | 5,160 | 1,996 | 402 | 267 | 60.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marion Bartoli | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #41 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #18 | 1,800 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 47–31 | 60.3% | #10 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #17 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #9 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #11 | 1,814 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #13 | 1,808 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |