H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Marion Bartoli vs Ekaterina Bychkova H2H: 1-0
Marion Bartoli holds a 1–0 lead over Ekaterina Bychkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marion Bartoli leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marion Bartoli won the 2006 Indian Wells second round 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2006* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marion Bartoli | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Ekaterina Bychkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | #13 | #7 | 5,160 | 1,996 | 402 | 267 | 60.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Ekaterina Bychkova | #814 | #66 | 588 | 1,584 | 34 | 67 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marion Bartoli | Ekaterina Bychkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #41 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #70 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #18 | 1,800 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #76 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 47–31 | 60.3% | #10 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #111 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #17 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #117 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #181 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #9 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #11 | 1,814 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #13 | 1,808 | 1 | 8 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |