H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marion Bartoli vs Melinda Czink H2H: 3-0
Marion Bartoli holds a 3–0 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marion Bartoli leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marion Bartoli won the 2011 Osaka third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 43
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2011* | Osaka | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marion Bartoli | 6-2 6-2 | Melinda Czink | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2009* | Charleston | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Marion Bartoli | 6-4 6-1 | Melinda Czink | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2009* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Marion Bartoli | 5-7 6-3 6-1 | Melinda Czink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | #13 | #7 | 5,160 | 1,996 | 402 | 267 | 60.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
| Melinda Czink | #691 | #37 | 1,571 | 1,794 | 89 | 136 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marion Bartoli | Melinda Czink | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #41 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #18 | 1,800 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #128 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 47–31 | 60.3% | #10 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #17 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #105 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #106 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #9 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2012 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #11 | 1,814 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2013 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #13 | 1,808 | 1 | 8 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #94 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #254 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |