H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Marion Bartoli vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 2-1

Marion Bartoli holds a 2–1 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marion Bartoli leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marion Bartoli won the 2006 New Haven fourth round 4-6 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marion Bartoli
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 25, 2006* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Marion Bartoli #27 4-6 6-4 7-6(4) Nadia Petrova #6 Match data
Jan 7, 2006* Auckland WTA 250 SF Hard Marion Bartoli #37 3-6 6-4 2-1 (ret.) Nadia Petrova #9 Match data
Feb 12, 2005* Paris WTA 500 QF Carpet Nadia Petrova #12 2-6 6-1 7-5 Marion Bartoli #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marion Bartoli #13 #7 5,160 1,996 402 267 60.1% 1 0 0 5 2 8
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marion Bartoli Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #307 1,483 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 2002 2–3 40.0% #104 1,511 0 0 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2003 20–21 48.8% #58 1,643 0 0 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2004 26–23 53.1% #41 1,666 0 0 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2005 26–25 51.0% #37 1,632 0 0 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #18 1,800 0 3 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2007 47–31 60.3% #10 1,873 0 3 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2008 30–26 53.6% #17 1,809 0 3 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2009 46–22 67.6% #11 1,882 0 5 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2010 36–21 63.2% #16 1,820 0 5 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 2011 60–26 69.8% #9 1,907 0 7 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2012 41–25 62.1% #11 1,814 0 7 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2013 23–15 60.5% #13 1,808 1 8 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 — — — — — — — 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 — — — — — — — 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13