H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Marion Bartoli vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 3-2

Marion Bartoli holds a 3–2 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Marion Bartoli leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marion Bartoli won the 2012 Australian Open first round 7-5 6-0.

FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 18, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Marion Bartoli #9 7-5 6-0 Virginie Razzano #84 Match data
Sep 2, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Virginie Razzano #157 7-5 6-4 Marion Bartoli #14 Match data
Jun 20, 2009* Eastbourne WTA 500 SF Grass Virginie Razzano #25 6-4 1-0 (ret.) Marion Bartoli #12 Match data
May 15, 2008* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Marion Bartoli #11 6-4 7-5 Virginie Razzano #28 Match data
Feb 9, 2008* Paris WTA 500 QF Carpet Marion Bartoli #9 6-1 7-6(3) Virginie Razzano #26 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Marion Bartoli #13 #7 5,160 1,996 402 267 60.1% 1 0 0 5 2 8
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marion Bartoli Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #307 1,483 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 2002 2–3 40.0% #104 1,511 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0
18 2003 20–21 48.8% #58 1,643 0 0 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0
19 2004 26–23 53.1% #41 1,666 0 0 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0
20 2005 26–25 51.0% #37 1,632 0 0 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #18 1,800 0 3 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0
22 2007 47–31 60.3% #10 1,873 0 3 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0
23 2008 30–26 53.6% #17 1,809 0 3 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0
24 2009 46–22 67.6% #11 1,882 0 5 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2
25 2010 36–21 63.2% #16 1,820 0 5 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2
26 2011 60–26 69.8% #9 1,907 0 7 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2
27 2012 41–25 62.1% #11 1,814 0 7 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2
28 2013 23–15 60.5% #13 1,808 1 8 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2
29 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2
30 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2
31 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2
32 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2
33 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2