H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Marketa Vondrousova vs Ana Konjuh H2H: 0-2
Ana Konjuh holds a 2–0 lead over Marketa Vondrousova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ana Konjuh leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ana Konjuh won the 2022 Adelaide 2 fourth round 4-6 6-2 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 27
Left-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 28
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2022* | Adelaide 2 | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Ana Konjuh | 4-6 6-2 7-6(3) | Marketa Vondrousova | Match data |
| May 4, 2017* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Ana Konjuh | 6-4 7-6(2) | Marketa Vondrousova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketa Vondrousova | #132 | #6 | 4,503 | 2,043 | 164 | 106 | 60.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Ana Konjuh | #647 | #20 | 1,830 | 1,786 | 84 | 80 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marketa Vondrousova | Ana Konjuh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #93 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2017 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #47 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2018 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #44 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2019 | 27–9 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,897 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2020 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1282 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2021 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #35 | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2022 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #92 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2023 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #7 | 1,961 | 1 | 2 | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2024 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #39 | 1,890 | 1 | 2 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2025 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #34 | 1,985 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 |