H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marlene Weingartner vs Iroda Tulyaganova H2H: 2-0
Marlene Weingartner holds a 2–0 lead over Iroda Tulyaganova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marlene Weingartner leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marlene Weingartner won the 2001 San Diego second round 7-6(4) 1-6 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 44
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2001* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Marlene Weingartner | 7-6(4) 1-6 7-6(2) | Iroda Tulyaganova | Match data |
| Jul 20, 2000* | Knokke-Heist | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Marlene Weingartner | 6-4 6-2 | Iroda Tulyaganova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marlene Weingartner | #1,051 | #36 | 808 | 1,677 | 84 | 134 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Iroda Tulyaganova | #862 | #16 | 1,349 | 1,820 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marlene Weingartner | Iroda Tulyaganova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1995 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #231 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1998 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #75 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1999 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #20 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2000 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #87 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #42 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #50 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2002 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #97 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #550 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2003 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #47 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2004 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #71 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #131 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2005 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #381 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |