H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Marlene Weingartner vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 2-0

Marlene Weingartner holds a 2–0 lead over Stephanie Foretz Gacon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marlene Weingartner leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marlene Weingartner won the 2003 Australian Open round of 64 3-6 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marlene Weingartner
GER Age 46 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Stephanie Foretz Gacon
FRA Age 45 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marlene Weingartner #90 3-6 6-1 6-2 Stephanie Foretz Gacon Match data Jan 17, 2003* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Marlene Weingartner #98 6-4 6-4 Stephanie Foretz Gacon Match data Jan 10, 2003* R16 Canberra Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marlene Weingartner #1,051 #36 808 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stephanie Foretz Gacon — — — 1,647 61 115 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marlene Weingartner Stephanie Foretz Gacon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 1–4 20.0% #231 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1996 0–1 0.0% #211 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1997 3–7 30.0% #127 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1998 4–4 50.0% #104 1,510 0 0 1999 1–2 33.3% — 1,511 0 0
19 1999 7–14 33.3% #92 1,532 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% — 1,513 0 0
20 2000 6–15 28.6% #87 1,493 0 0 2001 5–6 45.5% — 1,558 0 0
21 2001 21–26 44.7% #42 1,545 0 0 2002 11–12 47.8% — 1,604 0 0
22 2002 9–20 31.0% #97 1,482 0 0 2003 12–15 44.4% — 1,589 0 0
23 2003 17–15 53.1% #47 1,645 0 0 2004 3–10 23.1% — 1,532 0 0
24 2004 13–17 43.3% #71 1,630 0 0 2005 5–14 26.3% — 1,500 0 0
25 2005 3–11 21.4% #381 1,509 0 0 2006 5–14 26.3% — 1,443 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2007 2–6 25.0% — 1,457 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2008 0–2 0.0% — 1,455 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2009 2–7 22.2% — 1,421 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2010 0–3 0.0% — 1,401 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2011 2–6 25.0% — 1,406 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2012 10–10 50.0% — 1,513 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2013 2–5 28.6% — 1,501 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marlene Weingartner Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
19 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2001 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2001 13 17 30 43.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2002 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2002 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2003 12 7 19 63.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2004 8 12 20 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 2 9 11 18.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
25 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 3 5 8 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 67 115 41.7% 26 43 69 37.7% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 9 12 25.0% — 31 59 90 34.4% 17 37 54 31.5% 11 17 28 39.3% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 15/76 of Marlene Weingartner's and 74/136 of Stephanie Foretz Gacon's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marlene Weingartner Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 4/27 1.5 6.8 53.2% 54.0% 39.1% 53.8% 40.0% 47.2% 46.4%
23 2003 5/32 2.2 5.0 57.8% 58.0% 37.5% 44.3% 45.1% 49.6% 38.7% 2004 5/13 1.2 5.2 56.7% 53.9% 47.6% 47.1% 38.1% 51.2% 42.6%
24 2004 6/30 1.5 3.8 60.6% 56.0% 42.2% 52.5% 40.6% 50.6% 47.1% 2005 6/19 2.5 7.0 59.4% 57.9% 44.5% 44.9% 46.2% 52.7% 44.4%
25 2005 4/14 1.5 7.3 55.1% 62.2% 40.5% 50.3% 35.4% 51.9% 38.3% 2006 12/19 1.8 4.7 61.9% 55.5% 38.3% 47.5% 40.8% 49.8% 41.6%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/8 1.8 6.8 57.8% 60.3% 32.5% 55.1% 54.2% 48.5% 36.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/2 1.0 1.0 70.7% 58.5% 23.5% 33.3% 100.0% 48.3% 34.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 8/9 1.8 4.8 62.8% 61.0% 46.9% 44.2% 42.6% 55.2% 41.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/3 1.5 3.5 59.5% 52.1% 24.3% 28.6% 7.1% 41.4% 30.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 7/8 3.0 4.0 58.8% 58.6% 43.5% 50.7% 57.5% 52.6% 39.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 18/20 2.6 3.6 55.5% 63.4% 44.5% 58.3% 46.7% 55.2% 44.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/7 1.3 3.7 55.2% 52.9% 37.3% 36.4% 53.7% 46.0% 46.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 13.0 7.0 64.1% 73.8% 36.2% 50.0% 42.9% 60.3% 41.5%
Career — 15/218 1.7 5.1 58.2% 58.3% 40.2% 49.2% 40.7% 50.6% 41.9% — 74/176 2.2 4.7 58.5% 58.6% 41.4% 49.0% 45.9% 51.6% 42.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marlene Weingartner Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1995 1481 101.2 — — — — — +75 — 27.3% -1.82 0–1 0–1 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1996 1471 99.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1997 1467 106.7 — — — — +25 +97 — 34.8% -1.48 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1998 1511 116.1 — — — — +6 +47 — 50.0% -0.06 2–0 0–2 — +0.31 1999 1511 107.7 — — — — — +38 — 37.5% -1.38 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.39
19 1999 1533 112.0 — — — — +6 +11 — 34.8% -1.74 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — -0.40 2000 1513 105.7 — — — — — +27 — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–0 — +0.01
20 2000 1493 99.2 — — — — -1 +8 — 28.3% -1.70 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.9 +0.79 2001 1559 118.8 — — — — +31 -46 — 46.4% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — -0.48
21 2001 1546 121.6 — — — — -18 +20 +50 45.5% -0.49 8–8 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 106.9 +0.06 2002 1605 127.2 — — — — -4 -29 -66 50.0% -0.10 1–3 (25%) 5–1 (83%) 101.5 +0.03
22 2002 1483 114.9 — — — — +47 +8 +62 35.5% -1.16 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 +0.40 2003 1589 115.5 -3.06 +0.16 0.879 47.0% 0 -51 +46 43.3% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 104.2 +0.97
23 2003 1646 127.8 -1.25 -1.46 0.767 44.3% +19 -99 -81 48.5% -0.44 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.8 -0.63 2004 1532 111.6 -1.58 -0.22 0.873 47.0% -19 +10 — 31.3% -1.19 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 100.0 -0.31
24 2004 1631 114.1 -1.58 +1.70 0.953 48.5% -17 -24 — 43.1% -0.66 5–2 (71%) 1–3 (25%) 102.5 -0.71 2005 1501 103.6 -0.99 -0.13 0.938 48.6% -44 -15 +148 29.3% -1.44 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 -0.82
25 2005 1510 107.7 -1.33 -2.67 0.796 45.2% +66 +24 — 31.3% -1.25 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.5 -0.27 2006 1444 101.7 -4.22 -1.54 0.829 45.8% +32 -13 — 32.6% -1.22 3–5 (38%) 0–2 — +0.07
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1457 115.6 -1.06 -2.17 0.702 42.7% +26 — — 27.8% -1.61 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.62
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1455 106.9 +3.39 +4.25 0.669 41.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.46
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1421 97.6 -0.52 -1.66 0.920 47.9% +55 -3 +137 30.4% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.41
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1402 102.9 -1.39 -0.34 0.524 35.8% — — — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.12
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1407 106.9 -1.79 -0.90 0.842 46.7% +64 -4 — 31.6% -1.32 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1513 113.5 -0.88 +0.34 1.000 50.1% -12 -50 +63 52.3% -0.32 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.73
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1502 102.0 -3.63 +0.69 0.868 46.6% -19 -44 — 31.3% -1.38 1–1 1–0 — -0.10
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1491 103.0 -2.87 -1.23 1.046 51.0% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.03
Career — 1679 119.1 -1.40 -0.52 0.849 46.2% +9 +7 +7 39.8% -0.95 33–27 (55%) 17–21 (45%) 106.9 +0.07 — 1648 117.4 -1.86 -0.48 0.879 47.2% +3 -19 +71 38.2% -0.88 21–35 (38%) 21–15 (58%) 102.5 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.