H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marta Marrero vs Milagros Sequera H2H: 1-1
Marta Marrero and Milagros Sequera are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marta Marrero leads 1–0 on clay, while Milagros Sequera leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Milagros Sequera won the 2004 S Hertogenbosch third round 6-7(3) 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
VEN
Age 45
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2004 | S Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Milagros Sequera | 6-7(3) 7-5 6-3 | Marta Marrero | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2003* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Marta Marrero | 6-1 6-2 | Milagros Sequera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marta Marrero | #727 | #47 | 700 | 1,705 | 72 | 100 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Milagros Sequera | #1,060 | #48 | 537 | 1,629 | 32 | 51 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marta Marrero | Milagros Sequera | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #70 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #61 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #87 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #98 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #115 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #285 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #77 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #134 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #103 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #74 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #204 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |