H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marta Marrero vs Rita Grande H2H: 0-2
Rita Grande holds a 2–0 lead over Marta Marrero in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rita Grande leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Rita Grande won the 2003 Casablanca semifinal 6-7(6) 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 51
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2003* | Casablanca | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Rita Grande | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 | Marta Marrero | Match data |
| May 21, 1999* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Rita Grande | 6-2 7-6 | Marta Marrero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marta Marrero | #727 | #47 | 700 | 1,705 | 72 | 100 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rita Grande | #1,172 | #24 | 1,020 | 1,755 | 172 | 218 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marta Marrero | Rita Grande | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #70 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #61 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #87 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #146 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #98 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #72 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #285 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #59 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #46 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #70 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1088 | 1,518 | 0 | 3 |