H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marta Marrero vs Selima Sfar H2H: 2-0
Marta Marrero holds a 2–0 lead over Selima Sfar in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marta Marrero leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marta Marrero won the 2002 Miami first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 49
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2002* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Marta Marrero | 6-2 6-2 | Selima Sfar | Match data |
| May 31, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Marta Marrero | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Selima Sfar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marta Marrero | #727 | #47 | 700 | 1,705 | 72 | 100 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Selima Sfar | #1,005 | #75 | 456 | 1,591 | 21 | 54 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marta Marrero | Selima Sfar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #70 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #61 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #87 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #98 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #285 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #193 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #281 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |