H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Marta Marrero vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 1-1
Marta Marrero and Tatiana Panova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marta Marrero leads 1–0 on clay, while Tatiana Panova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marta Marrero won the 2004 Rome second round 6-1 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
154 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2004* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Marta Marrero | 6-1 7-6(3) | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
| Jun 18, 2001 | S Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Tatiana Panova | 6-3 6-4 | Marta Marrero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marta Marrero | #727 | #47 | 700 | 1,705 | 72 | 100 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marta Marrero | Tatiana Panova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #70 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #61 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #87 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #98 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #285 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |