H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marta Marrero vs Tatiana Perebiynis H2H: 0-2
Tatiana Perebiynis holds a 2–0 lead over Marta Marrero in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tatiana Perebiynis leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Perebiynis won the 2005 Miami first round 6-3 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 43
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2005* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Tatiana Perebiynis | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | Marta Marrero | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2003* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tatiana Perebiynis | 6-1 6-4 | Marta Marrero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marta Marrero | #727 | #47 | 700 | 1,705 | 72 | 100 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tatiana Perebiynis | #1,227 | #55 | 768 | 1,608 | 39 | 69 | 36.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marta Marrero | Tatiana Perebiynis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #70 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #61 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #87 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #98 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #78 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #91 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #285 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #214 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #97 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #867 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |