H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Martina Hingis vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 2-0

Martina Hingis holds a 2–0 lead over Iveta Benesova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2007 Miami Open round of 64 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Hingis
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Iveta Benesova
CZE Age 43 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Hingis #6 6-3 6-2 Iveta Benesova #96 Match data Mar 21, 2007* R64 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #349 6-4 6-1 Iveta Benesova #42 Match data Jan 21, 2006* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,373 516 127 80.2% 5 17 2 16 3 43
Iveta Benesova #671 #25 1,811 1,762 178 223 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Hingis Iveta Benesova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14 — — — — — — —
17 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19 — — — — — — —
18 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26 — — — — — — —
19 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35 2002 6–9 40.0% #82 1,564 0 0
20 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38 2003 9–19 32.1% #132 1,478 0 0
21 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40 2004 25–20 55.6% #36 1,646 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 2005 21–27 43.8% #55 1,610 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 2006 17–21 44.7% #58 1,592 0 1
24 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40 2007 6–14 30.0% #116 1,521 0 1
25 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42 2008 21–18 53.8% #43 1,652 0 1
26 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,858 5 43 2009 29–25 53.7% #38 1,647 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2010 18–24 42.9% #59 1,637 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2011 16–24 40.0% #54 1,626 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2012 10–17 37.0% #81 1,579 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2014 0–5 0.0% #671 1,519 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Hingis Iveta Benesova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8% 2002 4 2 6 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2003 4 5 9 44.4% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 2004 11 13 24 45.8% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 11 11 22 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 6 10 40.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 2008 8 8 16 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 10 14 24 41.7% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 13 15 28 46.4% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 9 9 18 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 299 76 375 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5% — 103 116 219 47.0% 65 79 144 45.1% 5 18 23 21.7% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Hingis Iveta Benesova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 111.3 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) 109.7 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +21 -97 -263 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) 99.7 -2.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +22 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) 100.4 -1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -242 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -3.02 2002 1564 116.6 — — — — +44 -100 — 47.4% -0.47 2–6 (25%) 4–2 (67%) 98.8 -0.65
20 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 99.1 -1.01 2003 1479 107.1 — — — — +105 -55 — 38.2% -0.94 4–8 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 95.1 +0.69
21 2002 2051 167.3 — — — — +75 +179 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.76 2004 1647 128.5 — — — — -23 +14 — 53.9% +0.09 9–5 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 106.0 +0.27
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1610 122.9 — — — — -28 +68 — 43.2% -0.50 13–9 (59%) 2–7 (22%) 99.0 -0.22
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1592 112.3 — — — — +38 +5 -151 40.9% -0.93 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 106.6 -0.26
24 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01 2007 1521 104.5 — — — — +85 -42 — 34.1% -1.25 3–3 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 97.1 -0.37
25 2006 2019 166.1 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 96.4 -3.22 2008 1652 126.5 — — — — -4 -18 — 50.5% +0.30 9–6 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 102.8 -0.69
26 2007 1859 147.6 +3.39 +4.14 1.205 54.0% +31 — +137 63.5% +1.15 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 91.3 +1.36 2009 1647 132.9 — — — — +22 +22 -131 50.9% +0.18 9–1 (90%) 4–3 (57%) 109.1 +1.09
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1637 121.1 — — — — +2 +1 — 44.7% -0.61 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 99.9 +0.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1627 135.9 — — — — +26 -37 — 40.2% -0.68 3–5 (38%) 0–3 (0%) 95.4 -2.20
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1579 127.8 — — — — +90 -3 -125 33.9% -1.08 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 102.9 -1.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1520 96.7 -2.44 -2.36 0.746 44.1% +94 — — 0.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.26
Career — 2373 179.5 +3.63 +5.03 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +1.99 92–57 (62%) 53–29 (65%) 103.7 -2.41 — 1763 127.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.746 44.1% +22 -6 -135 44.0% -0.47 71–55 (56%) 35–44 (44%) 101.5 -1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.