H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Martina Hingis vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 2-0
Martina Hingis holds a 2–0 lead over Iveta Benesova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2007 Miami second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2007* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-3 6-2 | Iveta Benesova | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-4 6-1 | Iveta Benesova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
| Iveta Benesova | #671 | #25 | 1,811 | 1,760 | 177 | 221 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Hingis | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 | 2002 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 | 2003 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #132 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 | 2004 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #36 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #58 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 | 2008 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #38 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #54 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #671 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |