H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Martina Hingis vs Monica Seles H2H: 15-5
Martina Hingis holds a 15–5 lead over Monica Seles in their WTA head-to-head. Across 20 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 10–4 on hard courts and 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2002 US Open fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
15
–
5
20 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-4 6-2 | Martina Hingis | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2002* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-3 6-2 | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Feb 4, 2002* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | F | Carpet | Martina Hingis | 7-6(6) 4-6 6-3 | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Jan 27, 2002* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Martina Hingis | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2001* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-3 1-6 6-4 | Martina Hingis | Match data |
| Aug 4, 2001* | San Diego | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-3 6-4 | Martina Hingis | Match data |
| Nov 19, 2000* | WTA Tour Championships | WTA Finals | F | Carpet | Martina Hingis | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2000 | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-0 7-5 | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2000* | Miami | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-0 6-0 | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Mar 15, 2000* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-3 6-1 | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1999* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | F | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-4 6-4 | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Jan 31, 1999* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-2 6-4 | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Sep 10, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-4 6-4 | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1998* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Monica Seles | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Martina Hingis | Match data |
| Jun 6, 1998* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | SF | Clay | Monica Seles | 6-3 6-2 | Martina Hingis | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1997* | San Diego | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Martina Hingis | 7-6 6-4 | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Jun 7, 1997* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | SF | Clay | Martina Hingis | 6-7(2) 7-5 6-4 | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Apr 6, 1997* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | F | Clay | Martina Hingis | 3-6 6-3 7-6 | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Mar 26, 1997* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | F | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-2 6-1 | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Nov 10, 1996* | Oakland | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Martina Hingis | 6-2 6-0 | Monica Seles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
| Monica Seles | #223 | #1 | 4,056 | 2,540 | 578 | 121 | 82.7% | 9 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 22 | 53 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Hingis | Monica Seles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #86 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 | 1990 | 55–6 | 90.2% | #2 | 2,295 | 1 | 10 |
| 17 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 | 1991 | 74–6 | 92.5% | #1 | 2,443 | 4 | 20 |
| 18 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 | 1992 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,499 | 7 | 30 |
| 19 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 | 1993 | 17–2 | 89.5% | #8 | 2,485 | 8 | 32 |
| 20 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 | 1995 | 11–1 | 91.7% | #1 | 2,487 | 8 | 33 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 43–8 | 84.3% | #2 | 2,342 | 9 | 38 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #5 | 2,159 | 9 | 41 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 | 1998 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,174 | 9 | 43 |
| 25 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 | 1999 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,116 | 9 | 44 |
| 26 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 | 2000 | 51–12 | 81.0% | #4 | 2,144 | 9 | 47 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,127 | 9 | 51 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,088 | 9 | 53 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #60 | 1,993 | 9 | 53 |