H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Martina Hingis vs Monica Seles H2H: 15-5

Martina Hingis holds a 15–5 lead over Monica Seles in their WTA head-to-head. Across 20 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 10–4 on hard courts and 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2002 US Open round of 16 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Hingis
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
15 – 5
20 main draw meetings
Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Monica Seles #5 6-4 6-2 Martina Hingis #8 Match data Sep 3, 2002* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Hingis #4 6-3 6-2 Monica Seles #9 Match data Mar 6, 2002 SF Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #4 7-6(6) 4-6 6-3 Monica Seles #10 Match data Feb 3, 2002* F Pan Pacific Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Martina Hingis #4 4-6 6-1 6-4 Monica Seles #10 Match data Jan 27, 2002* SF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Monica Seles #10 6-3 1-6 6-4 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Aug 11, 2001* SF Los Angeles Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Monica Seles #10 6-3 6-4 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Aug 4, 2001* SF San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 Monica Seles #4 Match data Nov 19, 2000* F WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Martina Hingis #1 6-0 7-5 Monica Seles #6 Match data Aug 22, 2000 QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-0 6-0 Monica Seles #8 Match data Mar 25, 2000* SF Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-3 6-1 Monica Seles #8 Match data Mar 19, 2000* QF Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-4 6-4 Monica Seles #5 Match data Aug 22, 1999* F Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #2 6-2 6-4 Monica Seles #4 Match data Jan 31, 1999* SF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-4 6-4 Monica Seles #6 Match data Sep 10, 1998* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Monica Seles #6 4-6 6-3 6-2 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Aug 22, 1998* SF Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Monica Seles #8 6-3 6-2 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Jun 6, 1998* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Martina Hingis #1 7-6 6-4 Monica Seles #3 Match data Aug 3, 1997* F San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-7(2) 7-5 6-4 Monica Seles #4 Match data Jun 7, 1997* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Martina Hingis #1 3-6 6-3 7-6 Monica Seles #5 Match data Apr 6, 1997* F Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Martina Hingis #2 6-2 6-1 Monica Seles #5 Match data Mar 26, 1997* F Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #7 6-2 6-0 Monica Seles #2 Match data Nov 10, 1996* F Oakland Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,373 516 127 80.2% 5 17 2 16 3 43
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 586 123 82.7% 9 9 3 21 11 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Hingis Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,599 0 0
15 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,005 0 1
16 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,296 1 10
17 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,444 4 20
18 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,500 7 30
19 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,486 8 32
20 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38 — — — — — — —
21 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,488 8 33
22 — — — — — — — 1996 46–9 83.6% #2 2,344 9 38
23 — — — — — — — 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,180 9 41
24 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,180 9 43
25 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,120 9 44
26 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,858 5 43 2000 56–13 81.2% #4 2,153 9 47
27 — — — — — — — 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,132 9 51
28 — — — — — — — 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,091 9 53
29 — — — — — — — 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,994 9 53

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Hingis Monica Seles
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3% 1989 6 2 8 75.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7%
16 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2% 1990 18 2 20 90.0% 22 0 22 100.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 11 3 14 78.6%
17 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1991 40 3 43 93.0% 19 2 21 90.5% — — — — 15 1 16 93.8%
18 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1992 33 3 36 91.7% 19 1 20 95.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 12 0 12 100.0%
19 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8% 1993 11 1 12 91.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0%
20 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1995 11 1 12 91.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 29 2 31 93.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 27 5 32 84.4% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 20 5 25 80.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 1999 21 7 28 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 2000 28 9 37 75.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 1 8 87.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 36 9 45 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 27 8 35 77.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
Career — 299 76 375 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5% — 316 63 379 83.4% 142 25 167 85.0% 35 11 46 76.1% 93 24 117 79.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Hingis Monica Seles
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) — -2.22 1988 1600 134.7 — — — — +49 — — 58.8% +0.29 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.41
15 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) — -2.29 1989 2005 170.5 — — — — -46 -209 -385 75.8% +2.03 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.76
16 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.45 1990 2297 179.4 — — — — -85 -99 -561 84.8% +2.78 7–3 (70%) 7–1 (88%) — -3.90
17 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +21 -97 -263 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) — -2.67 1991 2445 183.7 — — — — 0 -66 — 86.9% +3.17 10–3 (77%) 4–3 (57%) — -3.24
18 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +22 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) — -1.79 1992 2501 182.5 — — — — +9 -35 -586 88.2% +3.24 10–1 (91%) 2–2 (50%) — -2.26
19 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -242 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) — -3.02 1993 2486 173.2 — — — — +21 -78 — 85.4% +3.27 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.84
20 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 2051 167.3 — — — — +75 +179 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.76 1995 2488 169.9 — — — — +5 — — 92.0% +3.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.63
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2344 176.3 — — — — +27 +5 -308 83.5% +2.58 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) — -0.42
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2181 174.0 — — — — +75 +103 -181 72.3% +1.95 10–6 (63%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.17
24 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01 1998 2180 173.5 — — — — +55 +77 -125 70.2% +1.77 10–5 (67%) 4–7 (36%) — -1.32
25 2006 2019 166.1 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) — -3.22 1999 2120 173.1 — — — — +56 +123 -164 73.3% +2.05 3–2 (60%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.29
26 2007 1859 147.6 +3.39 +4.14 1.205 54.0% +31 — +137 63.5% +1.15 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.36 2000 2153 175.3 — — — — +19 +110 -86 78.0% +2.03 9–5 (64%) 12–1 (92%) — -2.96
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2132 162.9 — — — — +27 — — 73.5% +1.72 10–5 (67%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.21
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2091 167.1 — — — — +54 +166 +47 70.1% +1.67 14–4 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -1.76
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1995 139.5 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +112 +183 — 56.8% +0.57 4–3 (57%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.67
Career — 2373 179.5 +3.63 +5.03 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +1.99 92–57 (62%) 53–29 (65%) 103.7 -2.41 — 2541 181.1 +0.40 +1.10 0.702 40.9% +21 +17 -276 78.2% +2.32 102–45 (69%) 69–52 (57%) 102.4 -2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.