H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Martina Hingis vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 16-0

Martina Hingis holds a 16–0 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 11–0 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2002 Sydney International quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Hingis
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
16 – 0
16 main-draw meetings
Sandrine Testud
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Hingis #4 6-4 6-2 Sandrine Testud #11 Match data Jan 11, 2002* QF Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-1 2-6 6-2 Sandrine Testud #21 Match data Jun 5, 2001* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Martina Hingis #1 6-3 5-7 6-4 Sandrine Testud #18 Match data Feb 24, 2001* QF Dubai Tennis Championships Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-3 6-2 Sandrine Testud #18 Match data Feb 18, 2001* F Qatar Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-2 6-1 Sandrine Testud #11 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-4 4-6 6-3 Sandrine Testud #11 Match data Aug 19, 2000* QF Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 7-5 5-7 6-2 Sandrine Testud #11 Match data May 11, 2000* QF Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Martina Hingis #1 6-4 6-2 Sandrine Testud #11 Match data Mar 4, 2000* QF Scottsdale WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-3 7-5 Sandrine Testud #15 Match data Feb 6, 2000* F Pan Pacific Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Martina Hingis #1 6-1 7-6(3) Sandrine Testud #14 Match data Jan 25, 2000* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Hingis #1 7-6 7-6 Sandrine Testud #14 Match data Nov 15, 1999 R16 WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Martina Hingis #1 6-7 6-2 6-4 Sandrine Testud #13 Match data Oct 9, 1999* SF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 7-6 3-6 6-4 Sandrine Testud #14 Match data Aug 22, 1998* QF Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-3 5-7 6-2 Sandrine Testud #13 Match data Mar 23, 1998* R16 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #21 4-6 6-3 7-6 Sandrine Testud #47 Match data Aug 16, 1995* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #60 6-1 6-2 Sandrine Testud #75 Match data May 4, 1995* R32 Hamburg Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,373 516 127 80.2% 5 17 2 16 3 43
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,003 309 237 56.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Hingis Sandrine Testud
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14 — — — — — — —
17 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19 — — — — — — —
18 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0
19 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,549 0 0
20 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,568 0 0
21 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,561 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0
24 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,774 0 0
25 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,920 0 1
26 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,858 5 43 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,945 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,917 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,977 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,846 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2004 1–8 11.1% #313 1,725 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Hingis Sandrine Testud
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1990 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8% 1991 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
20 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1992 7 9 16 43.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 1997 20 10 30 66.7% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
26 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0% 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 20 12 32 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 7 16 56.3%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 20 10 30 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 39 17 56 69.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 299 76 375 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5% — 183 118 301 60.8% 78 66 144 54.2% 19 21 40 47.5% 29 32 61 47.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Hingis Sandrine Testud
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 111.3 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) 109.7 -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +21 -97 -263 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) 99.7 -2.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +22 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) 100.4 -1.79 1990 1484 99.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.16
19 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -242 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -3.02 1991 1550 115.1 — — — — +5 -2 — 47.6% +0.14 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.2 +0.80
20 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 99.1 -1.01 1992 1568 120.4 — — — — +2 -13 -14 42.2% -0.63 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 98.5 +0.18
21 2002 2051 167.3 — — — — +75 +179 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.76 1993 1561 126.2 — — — — +20 -9 — 39.7% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 98.5 -1.09
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1605 130.9 — — — — +19 -44 — 45.3% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +0.24
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1737 138.2 — — — — +1 -140 — 55.1% +0.24 3–5 (38%) 3–4 (43%) 99.9 -0.86
24 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01 1996 1774 140.4 — — — — -7 -110 -241 54.7% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 104.9 +1.01
25 2006 2019 166.1 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 96.4 -3.22 1997 1921 159.0 — — — — -23 -105 -290 60.1% +0.67 13–6 (68%) 9–7 (56%) 108.5 -0.03
26 2007 1859 147.6 +3.39 +4.14 1.205 54.0% +31 — +137 63.5% +1.15 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 91.3 +1.36 1998 1945 158.8 — — — — -9 -36 -184 63.6% +1.08 19–10 (66%) 10–10 (50%) 106.1 +1.78
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1901 157.5 — — — — +27 -33 -217 56.7% +0.48 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 +2.23
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1918 163.3 — — — — +69 -103 -240 56.6% +0.65 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 -2.28
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1978 158.2 — — — — +16 -130 -244 62.3% +0.97 14–9 (61%) 10–13 (43%) 100.0 -3.00
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1846 144.7 — — — — +107 +12 -165 52.0% +0.39 8–5 (62%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +1.55
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1726 120.4 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +166 +41 — 26.3% -1.58 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -1.36
Career — 2373 179.5 +3.63 +5.03 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +1.99 92–57 (62%) 53–29 (65%) 103.7 -2.41 — 2004 155.8 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +17 -60 -202 55.2% +0.45 98–79 (55%) 64–61 (51%) 103.8 -0.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.