H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Martina Hingis vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 16-0
Martina Hingis holds a 16–0 lead over Sandrine Testud in their WTA head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 11–0 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2002 Sydney quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
16
–
0
16 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2002* | Sydney | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-4 6-2 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Jun 5, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Martina Hingis | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2001* | Dubai | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2001* | Doha | WTA 1000 | F | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-3 6-2 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2000 | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-2 6-1 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2000* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| May 11, 2000* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Martina Hingis | 7-5 5-7 6-2 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Mar 4, 2000* | Scottsdale | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-4 6-2 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Feb 6, 2000* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | F | Carpet | Martina Hingis | 6-3 7-5 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Jan 25, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-1 7-6(3) | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Nov 15, 1999 | WTA Tour Championships | WTA Finals | R16 | Carpet | Martina Hingis | 7-6 7-6 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1999* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-7 6-2 6-4 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1998* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Martina Hingis | 7-6 3-6 6-4 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Mar 23, 1998* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-3 5-7 6-2 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1995* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 4-6 6-3 7-6 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
| May 4, 1995* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Martina Hingis | 6-1 6-2 | Sandrine Testud | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
| Sandrine Testud | #1,203 | #9 | 2,233 | 2,019 | 309 | 236 | 56.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Hingis | Sandrine Testud | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 | 1993 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 | 1996 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 | 1997 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #14 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 | 1998 | 51–26 | 66.2% | #14 | 1,946 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #38 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #313 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |