H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Martina Müller vs Myriam Casanova H2H: 1-2
Myriam Casanova holds a 2–1 lead over Martina Müller in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Myriam Casanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Myriam Casanova won the 2003 Indian Wells first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 43
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Myriam Casanova | 6-3 6-4 | Martina Müller | Match data |
| Jul 13, 2002* | Brussels | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Myriam Casanova | 6-4 7-5 | Martina Müller | Match data |
| Apr 21, 2002* | Budapest | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Martina Müller | 6-2 3-6 6-4 | Myriam Casanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Müller | #808 | #33 | 702 | 1,647 | 62 | 107 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Myriam Casanova | #936 | #45 | 749 | 1,729 | 27 | 29 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martina Müller | Myriam Casanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 15–6 | 71.4% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2002 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #120 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2003 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #336 | 1,460 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,422 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #34 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 16–28 | 36.4% | #53 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,441 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |