H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Pam Shriver H2H: 39-3

Martina Navratilova holds a 39–3 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 42 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 19–0 on carpet and 11–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1992 San Antonio semifinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
39 – 3
42 main-draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martina Navratilova #4 6-4 6-3 Pam Shriver #36 Match data Mar 28, 1992* SF San Antonio Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Martina Navratilova #4 6-2 7-6 Pam Shriver #38 Match data Feb 15, 1992* QF Chicago Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Martina Navratilova #5 7-5 6-1 Pam Shriver #30 Match data Sep 1, 1991* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Navratilova #3 7-6 6-1 Pam Shriver #40 Match data Feb 15, 1991* R16 Chicago Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Martina Navratilova #2 6-4 6-3 Pam Shriver #20 Match data Feb 17, 1990* SF Chicago Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Martina Navratilova #2 6-2 6-0 Pam Shriver #13 Match data Nov 4, 1989* QF Worcester WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova #2 6-0 6-2 Pam Shriver #4 Match data Feb 22, 1988 F Washington Open Category 5 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Navratilova #2 6-0 6-3 Pam Shriver #4 Match data Feb 14, 1988* F Dallas WTA 250 Hard
Martina Navratilova #1 6-4 4-6 6-3 Pam Shriver #6 Match data Jun 20, 1987* SF Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Martina Navratilova #1 6-2 4-6 6-4 Pam Shriver #6 Match data Nov 17, 1986 SF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Martina Navratilova #1 3-6 7-6 6-4 Pam Shriver #6 Match data Nov 8, 1986* SF Worcester WTA 250 Hard
Martina Navratilova #1 6-1 7-6 Pam Shriver #5 Match data Oct 18, 1986* SF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova #1 6-1 4-6 6-2 Pam Shriver #5 Match data Oct 5, 1986* F New Orleans WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova #1 6-2 6-4 Pam Shriver #5 Match data Sep 5, 1986* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Navratilova #1 6-4 6-4 Pam Shriver #6 Match data Mar 8, 1986* SF Princeton WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova #1 6-1 6-1 Pam Shriver #4 Match data Jan 18, 1986* SF Worcester WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova #1 6-1 6-4 Pam Shriver #4 Match data Jan 6, 1986 F Washington Open WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova #2 6-3 7-5 Pam Shriver #4 Match data Nov 17, 1985* F Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass
Martina Navratilova #2 7-6 6-3 Pam Shriver #5 Match data Jul 5, 1985* QF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Martina Navratilova #1 6-2 6-4 Pam Shriver #8 Match data Mar 18, 1985 QF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Martina Navratilova #1 6-4 4-6 7-5 Pam Shriver #4 Match data Aug 19, 1984* F Mahwah WTA 250 Hard
Martina Navratilova #1 7-6 6-4 Pam Shriver #3 Match data Feb 28, 1984 SF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-4 6-3 Pam Shriver Match data Dec 12, 1983* SF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Martina Navratilova 6-3 6-2 Pam Shriver Match data Oct 16, 1983* F Tampa WTA 250 Hard
Martina Navratilova 6-2 6-1 Pam Shriver Match data Sep 11, 1983* SF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Navratilova 6-2 6-1 Pam Shriver Match data Aug 13, 1983* SF Manhattan Beach WTA 250 Hard
Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-2 Pam Shriver Match data Mar 23, 1983 QF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-3 Pam Shriver Match data Feb 19, 1983* SF Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-2 6-4 Pam Shriver Match data Dec 12, 1982* SF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Pam Shriver 1-6 7-6(5) 6-2 Martina Navratilova Match data Sep 10, 1982* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Navratilova 6-4 7-6(1) Pam Shriver Match data Dec 19, 1981* SF East Rutherford WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-3 7-5 Pam Shriver Match data Dec 13, 1981* SF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Martina Navratilova 3-6 6-1 6-3 Pam Shriver Match data Mar 22, 1981 R32 WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Martina Navratilova 6-2 6-4 Pam Shriver Match data Mar 15, 1981* F Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver 6-4 6-3 Martina Navratilova Match data Dec 6, 1980* QF Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Martina Navratilova 7-5 7-5 Pam Shriver Match data Jul 26, 1980* SF Richmond WTA 250 Carpet
Martina Navratilova 4-6 6-1 7-5 Pam Shriver Match data Jul 19, 1980* SF Montreal WTA 250 Hard
Martina Navratilova 6-3 6-7 6-0 Pam Shriver Match data May 4, 1980* QF Orlando WTA 250 Clay
Martina Navratilova 7-6 6-1 Pam Shriver Match data Apr 20, 1980* QF Amelia Island WTA 250 Clay
Martina Navratilova 6-3 7-6 Pam Shriver Match data Jan 19, 1980* QF Kansas City WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver 7-6(3) 7-6(3) Martina Navratilova Match data Sep 10, 1978* SF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Navratilova 5-7 6-2 6-1 Pam Shriver Match data Apr 14, 1978* R16 Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,680 1,419 228 86.2% 18 3 8 38 100 167
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Navratilova Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1
16 1973 17–17 50.0% — 1,741 0 0 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1
17 1974 34–20 63.0% — 1,960 0 1 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2
18 1975 82–22 78.8% #3 2,246 0 5 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4
19 1976 41–16 71.9% #4 2,166 0 7 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5
20 1977 67–15 81.7% #3 2,250 0 13 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8
21 1978 78–9 89.7% #1 2,433 1 24 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1979 91–12 88.3% #1 2,439 2 34 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14
23 1980 86–12 87.8% #3 2,366 2 45 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16
24 1981 90–15 85.7% #3 2,423 3 55 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20
25 1982 85–3 96.6% #1 2,538 5 70 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24
26 1983 84–1 98.8% #1 2,638 8 86 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24
27 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,649 11 99 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24
28 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,595 13 111 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24
29 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,633 15 125 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24
30 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,527 17 129 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,455 17 138 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,425 17 146 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,322 18 152 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,321 18 157 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24
35 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,328 18 161 — — — — — — —
36 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,265 18 166 — — — — — — —
37 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 167 — — — — — — —
45 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 167 — — — — — — —
47 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 167 — — — — — — —
48 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 167 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martina Navratilova Pam Shriver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
16 1973 0 2 2 0.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
17 1974 1 3 4 25.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1975 25 7 32 78.1% 25 7 32 78.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5%
19 1976 10 4 14 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 2 16 87.5% 16 8 24 66.7% 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1977 17 6 23 73.9% 10 1 11 90.9% 9 3 12 75.0% 31 5 36 86.1% 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4%
21 1978 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 0 13 100.0% 43 4 47 91.5% 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0%
22 1979 14 3 17 82.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 2 16 87.5% 59 6 65 90.8% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6%
23 1980 18 5 23 78.3% 9 0 9 100.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 47 3 50 94.0% 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9%
24 1981 14 2 16 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6% 21 4 25 84.0% 44 6 50 88.0% 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3%
25 1982 12 1 13 92.3% 15 0 15 100.0% 21 1 22 95.5% 37 1 38 97.4% 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2%
26 1983 22 0 22 100.0% 12 1 13 92.3% 19 0 19 100.0% 31 0 31 100.0% 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1984 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 27 1 28 96.4% 18 1 19 94.7% 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
28 1985 24 3 27 88.9% 14 1 15 93.3% 29 0 29 100.0% 17 1 18 94.4% 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 1986 17 0 17 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 13 0 13 100.0% 44 1 45 97.8% 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 1987 15 2 17 88.2% 13 3 16 81.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 11 1 12 91.7% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
31 1988 26 3 29 89.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 12 1 13 92.3% 15 1 16 93.8% 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
32 1989 28 3 31 90.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 1 18 94.4% 17 2 19 89.5% 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 1990 12 2 14 85.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 13 0 13 100.0% 13 2 15 86.7% 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 1991 15 2 17 88.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 1 16 93.8% 17 3 20 85.0% 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 14 1 15 93.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 17 4 21 81.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 15 2 17 88.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 17 3 20 85.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 8 2 10 80.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
45 2002 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
47 2004 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
48 2005 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 344 57 401 85.8% 226 58 284 79.6% 315 42 357 88.2% 534 71 605 88.3% — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martina Navratilova Pam Shriver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1483 98.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.21 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06
16 1973 1742 151.2 — — — — -211 +47 -161 52.0% +0.01 4–5 (44%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -2.70 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83
17 1974 1961 159.8 — — — — -284 +114 -237 60.3% +0.74 12–11 (52%) 11–4 (73%) 109.9 -9.92 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03
18 1975 2247 173.0 — — — — +6 -18 -381 75.8% +1.74 14–7 (67%) 11–2 (85%) 111.4 -10.84 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74
19 1976 2166 161.0 — — — — +4 -34 -73 70.4% +1.38 11–6 (65%) 4–1 (80%) 102.0 -6.41 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82
20 1977 2251 173.4 — — — — +102 -69 -110 79.0% +2.21 7–7 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 100.7 -8.80 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79
21 1978 2434 178.4 — — — — +35 -307 -96 84.1% +2.77 15–2 (88%) 5–10 (33%) 104.2 -6.56 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74
22 1979 2440 178.7 — — — — +37 -222 -63 84.3% +2.59 11–3 (79%) 7–2 (78%) 102.8 -4.63 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23
23 1980 2367 177.3 — — — — +175 -69 -15 82.0% +2.50 17–6 (74%) 13–3 (81%) 101.9 -4.48 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63
24 1981 2423 179.0 — — — — +104 -134 -12 80.4% +2.47 16–11 (59%) 7–9 (44%) 93.9 -8.43 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44
25 1982 2539 179.0 — — — — +107 -124 -87 90.0% +3.08 13–3 (81%) 12–4 (75%) 104.0 -2.79 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71
26 1983 2638 183.0 — — — — +115 -236 -76 94.9% +3.91 7–1 (88%) 5–0 (100%) 105.4 -2.30 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34
27 1984 2649 177.2 — — — — +103 -152 -65 94.0% +3.48 7–2 (78%) 7–1 (88%) 103.4 -1.21 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41
28 1985 2595 177.6 — — — — +45 -39 +99 90.1% +3.06 10–3 (77%) 9–4 (69%) 101.4 -1.95 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30
29 1986 2634 182.2 — — — — +69 -119 +83 91.0% +3.03 12–2 (86%) 14–2 (88%) 107.4 -2.24 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50
30 1987 2527 176.8 — — — — +116 -43 +190 85.7% +2.83 3–2 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 99.6 -3.06 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73
31 1988 2456 176.7 — — — — +130 +15 +223 85.5% +2.93 10–3 (77%) 3–5 (38%) 94.4 -2.10 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51
32 1989 2425 176.2 — — — — +96 -16 +175 86.5% +2.82 7–4 (64%) 9–1 (90%) 98.0 -2.04 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26
33 1990 2323 174.5 — — — — +99 +62 +414 84.5% +2.88 6–5 (55%) 5–3 (63%) 94.9 -0.34 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33
34 1991 2322 172.3 — — — — +106 +3 +333 79.3% +2.24 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 101.2 -1.85 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20
35 1992 2328 175.0 — — — — +97 — +412 77.5% +2.13 6–6 (50%) 10–0 (100%) 98.4 -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 2265 172.8 — — — — +97 -12 +351 79.2% +2.30 9–3 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 100.2 -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 2074 161.5 — — — — +133 +37 +402 64.9% +1.41 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 92.1 -1.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
45 2002 2052 102.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
47 2004 1941 100.2 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% — +91 — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
48 2005 1911 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2680 180.0 +0.20 -0.26 1.142 52.8% +78 -38 +49 81.7% +2.48 220–109 (67%) 170–74 (70%) 105.4 -5.25 — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.