H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Martina Navratilova vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 5-0

Martina Navratilova holds a 5–0 lead over Patricia Medrado in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 3–0 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Martina Navratilova won the 1988 Roland Garros first round 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Patricia Medrado
BRA Age 69

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 25, 1988* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Martina Navratilova #2 6-0 6-3 Patricia Medrado #108 Match data
Oct 23, 1982* Filderstadt WTA 250 QF Carpet Martina Navratilova 6-1 6-2 Patricia Medrado Match data
May 1, 1982* Orlando WTA 250 QF Clay Martina Navratilova 6-3 6-0 Patricia Medrado Match data
Feb 2, 1978* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Martina Navratilova 6-0 6-1 Patricia Medrado Match data
Jan 19, 1978* Houston WTA 250 R32 Carpet Martina Navratilova 6-0 6-0 Patricia Medrado Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168
Patricia Medrado #359 #67 9 1,837 152 163 48.3% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martina Navratilova Patricia Medrado
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 20–17 54.1% — 1,761 0 2 — — — — — — —
17 1974 39–20 66.1% — 1,975 0 4 — — — — — — —
18 1975 81–21 79.4% — 2,218 0 7 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,535 0 0
19 1976 41–16 71.9% — 2,153 0 9 1976 0–2 0.0% — 1,516 0 0
20 1977 67–15 81.7% — 2,243 0 15 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,527 0 1
21 1978 78–9 89.7% — 2,420 1 26 1978 6–11 35.3% — 1,582 0 1
22 1979 91–12 88.3% — 2,428 2 36 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,600 0 1
23 1980 86–12 87.8% — 2,344 2 47 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,649 0 4
24 1981 90–15 85.7% — 2,407 3 57 1981 38–20 65.5% — 1,740 0 8
25 1982 85–3 96.6% — 2,521 5 72 1982 33–25 56.9% — 1,779 0 10
26 1983 84–1 98.8% — 2,622 8 88 1983 4–18 18.2% — 1,577 0 10
27 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101 1984 11–15 42.3% #108 1,588 0 10
28 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113 1985 8–14 36.4% #108 1,542 0 10
29 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126 1986 12–14 46.2% #76 1,562 0 10
30 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130 1987 6–13 31.6% #117 1,552 0 10
31 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139 1988 4–11 26.7% #180 1,474 0 10
32 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147 — — — — — — —
33 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153 — — — — — — —
34 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158 — — — — — — —
35 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162 — — — — — — —
36 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167 — — — — — — —
37 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168 — — — — — — —
45 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 168 — — — — — — —
47 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168 — — — — — — —
48 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168 — — — — — — —