H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Helen Gourlay H2H: 3-0
Mary Ann Eisel holds a 3–0 lead over Helen Gourlay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Ann Eisel leads 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Ann Eisel won the 1969 Beckenham quarterfinal 7-5 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 1969* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | Helen Gourlay | Match data |
| Aug 18, 1968* | Baltimore | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-4 6-4 | Helen Gourlay | Match data |
| Jan 12, 1968* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 9-7 2-6 6-2 | Helen Gourlay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Helen Gourlay | — | — | — | 1,962 | 294 | 200 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Helen Gourlay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 48–21 | 69.6% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | 1969 | 40–28 | 58.8% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | 1970 | 42–22 | 65.6% | — | 1,842 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 1,904 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 34–25 | 57.6% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | 1973 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | 1974 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,942 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | 1975 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,838 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 24–19 | 55.8% | — | 1,892 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 9 |