H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mary Ann Eisel vs Kristy Pigeon H2H: 3-0
Mary Ann Eisel holds a 3–0 lead over Kristy Pigeon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Ann Eisel leads 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Ann Eisel won the 1971 Newport fourth round 6-2 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1971* | Newport | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-2 1-0 (ret.) | Kristy Pigeon | Match data |
| Jun 7, 1969* | Manchester | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 6-2 6-4 | Kristy Pigeon | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1968* | South Orange | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Mary Ann Eisel | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Kristy Pigeon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Ann Eisel | — | — | — | 1,945 | 172 | 95 | 64.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Kristy Pigeon | — | — | — | 1,821 | 112 | 95 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Ann Eisel | Kristy Pigeon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 15–26 | 36.6% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1968 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1969 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1970 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 11 | 1974 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1971 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |