H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Mary Dailey vs Annette Patchen H2H: 1-0

Mary Dailey holds a 1–0 lead over Annette Patchen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Dailey leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Dailey won the 1987 ASB Classic round of 64 6-0 6-2.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Dailey 6-0 6-2 Annette Patchen Match data Jan 27, 1987* R64 ASB Classic WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Dailey 1,505 2 3 40.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annette Patchen 1,500 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Mary Dailey Annette Patchen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1980 1–2 33.3% 1,487 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% 1,483 0 0
1987 1–1 50.0% 1,488 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Mary Dailey Annette Patchen
Yr Hard Yr Hard
W L M Win % W L M Win %
1980 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 0 1 1 0.0%
1987 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 2 2 4 50.0% Career 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Mary Dailey Annette Patchen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1980 1488 92.1 33.3% -2.17 +0.32 1987 1483 93.4 0.0% -5.00 +0.16
1987 1488 103.3 50.0% +0.75 +0.35
Career 1506 97.4 40.0% -1.00 +13.40 Career 1500 96.5 0.0% -5.00 +16.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.