H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 3-1

Mary Pierce holds a 3–1 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2003 Australian Open second round 0-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 17, 2003* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Chanda Rubin #13 0-6 6-4 6-2 Mary Pierce #50 Match data
Oct 15, 1999* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Mary Pierce #6 6-1 6-2 Chanda Rubin #25 Match data
Oct 15, 1998* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Mary Pierce #11 7-5 2-6 6-3 Chanda Rubin #40 Match data
Oct 14, 1994* Filderstadt WTA 250 R16 Hard Mary Pierce #6 7-5 7-6 Chanda Rubin #26 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 — — — — — — —