H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Greta Arn H2H: 0-1

Greta Arn holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Greta Arn leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Greta Arn won the 2002 San Diego round of 64 3-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Greta Arn
Hungary Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Greta Arn #84 3-6 6-3 6-4 Mary Pierce #50 Match data Jul 31, 2002* R64 San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,145 465 218 68.1% 2 5 0 5 6 18
Greta Arn #448 #40 1,370 1,694 58 91 38.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Greta Arn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,785 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1992 32–10 76.2% #13 1,900 0 4 — — — — — — —
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 — — — — — — —
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,055 0 5 — — — — — — —
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,007 1 7 — — — — — — —
21 1996 18–12 60.0% #24 1,881 1 7 2000 0–4 0.0% #152 1,468 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,066 1 8 2001 4–9 30.8% #118 1,472 0 0
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,124 1 12 2002 7–13 35.0% #91 1,498 0 0
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 2003 0–2 0.0% #288 1,484 0 0
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,032 2 15 — — — — — — —
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,838 2 15 — — — — — — —
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,751 2 15 2006 1–1 50.0% #225 1,492 0 0
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2007 6–7 46.2% #118 1,517 0 1
29 2004 25–17 59.5% #29 1,785 2 16 2008 7–5 58.3% #162 1,588 0 1
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,128 2 18 2009 1–4 20.0% #235 1,556 0 1
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,974 2 18 2010 7–11 38.9% #88 1,574 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2011 17–15 53.1% #63 1,647 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2012 7–15 31.8% #114 1,555 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2013 0–2 0.0% #421 1,536 0 2
40 — — — — — — — 2019 1–3 25.0% #406 1,551 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mary Pierce Greta Arn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 9 2 11 81.8% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 19 6 25 76.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 15 5 20 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 12 5 17 70.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 25 6 31 80.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1997 14 6 20 70.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1998 14 6 20 70.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 1 15 93.3% 2002 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1999 24 10 34 70.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2000 13 6 19 68.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2008 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2005 19 5 24 79.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 2009 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2006 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2010 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 9 9 18 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 6 7 13 46.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 207 99 306 67.6% 157 72 229 68.6% 27 13 40 67.5% 74 34 108 68.5% — 24 41 65 36.9% 28 37 65 43.1% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 6 8 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 60/152 of Mary Pierce's and 98/108 of Greta Arn's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mary Pierce Greta Arn
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
28 2003 9/40 3.9 1.9 64.5% 68.8% 54.0% 63.9% 46.3% 63.3% 44.5% 2007 9/13 2.7 3.7 61.0% 62.8% 44.3% 42.2% 44.4% 55.6% 48.6%
29 2004 7/42 1.6 2.1 67.0% 71.4% 54.8% 59.0% 37.4% 66.4% 41.8% 2008 10/12 2.7 4.6 58.0% 64.1% 39.7% 49.7% 38.9% 54.1% 46.7%
30 2005 28/53 3.1 1.5 68.1% 68.9% 54.4% 59.1% 48.4% 64.3% 46.0% 2009 5/5 2.0 4.8 64.3% 63.3% 42.5% 59.7% 44.7% 55.9% 42.7%
31 2006 16/17 3.5 1.4 67.3% 69.2% 47.5% 52.5% 42.1% 62.2% 42.2% 2010 17/18 3.5 4.1 58.9% 58.2% 45.6% 47.5% 45.1% 52.3% 35.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 30/32 2.5 3.9 58.1% 60.7% 42.1% 53.7% 45.1% 53.3% 42.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 21/22 2.5 4.4 56.0% 63.7% 43.2% 50.7% 44.1% 55.0% 38.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 2/2 2.0 5.5 44.6% 62.4% 35.8% 40.8% 50.0% 47.5% 28.9%
40 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 4/4 5.3 6.5 56.0% 60.3% 36.3% 58.5% 42.7% 49.8% 34.9%
Career — 60/683 3.1 1.6 67.2% 69.2% 52.6% 58.1% 45.1% 63.9% 44.3% — 98/149 2.8 4.3 58.0% 61.6% 42.5% 50.8% 44.2% 53.6% 40.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mary Pierce Greta Arn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1480 106.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1544 134.3 — — — — +3 +35 — 48.3% +0.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 1786 146.7 — — — — -38 -56 — 66.7% +1.33 6–2 (75%) 5–1 (83%) 108.5 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 1900 149.4 — — — — -37 -50 — 75.3% +2.01 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 100.2 +3.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 2003 165.9 — — — — -4 -109 — 70.4% +1.83 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) 98.2 +1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 2055 169.7 — — — — -25 -54 — 70.9% +1.86 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 100.7 +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 2008 168.6 — — — — +34 -13 — 72.1% +1.78 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 94.5 +1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 1881 134.2 — — — — +65 +72 -205 58.3% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.2 +2.43 2000 1468 101.9 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.33 0–1 0–2 — -0.18
22 1997 2066 169.1 — — — — -62 +83 -301 68.5% +1.35 12–4 (75%) 6–3 (67%) 108.2 -4.07 2001 1473 117.1 — — — — +30 +42 — 38.7% -0.84 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.05
23 1998 2124 173.3 — — — — +36 -4 — 66.0% +1.50 12–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) 110.4 -2.64 2002 1499 117.8 — — — — +36 -41 +84 37.8% -0.87 2–3 (40%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.17
24 1999 2053 167.4 — — — — +28 +14 -309 67.8% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +1.22 2003 1485 99.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — -0.13
25 2000 2033 163.9 — — — — -27 +116 — 72.3% +2.00 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 1839 112.0 — — — — +44 +254 — 48.4% -0.13 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — +1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 1752 124.6 — — — — +10 +260 +15 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 92.5 -0.57 2006 1492 101.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.06
28 2003 1787 140.5 +4.39 +0.45 1.214 53.8% -23 +157 +58 58.1% +0.66 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.38 2007 1518 107.2 -0.21 -0.11 1.094 51.7% — +44 — 46.9% -0.03 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.7 +0.10
29 2004 1785 145.7 +5.15 -0.28 1.246 53.7% -31 +86 +122 59.6% +1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.9 -1.86 2008 1588 120.6 -0.21 +0.60 1.018 50.3% — +59 — 59.3% +0.41 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.12
30 2005 2128 166.4 +7.54 +2.70 1.291 54.8% -48 -147 -186 71.7% +1.54 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 108.3 -3.66 2009 1556 108.5 -0.80 -1.13 0.968 49.2% — +39 — 38.5% -0.46 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.31
31 2006 1975 136.3 +4.44 -0.56 1.116 52.0% -39 — — 55.9% +0.27 1–1 5–3 (63%) — -0.83 2010 1575 114.3 -2.22 -4.60 0.751 44.4% -81 +16 +48 38.1% -1.17 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.44
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1648 125.2 -1.46 -0.86 0.914 48.2% -68 0 — 52.2% -0.34 6–3 (67%) 5–1 (83%) 107.1 -0.73
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1555 113.1 -0.79 -4.12 0.848 46.7% +29 +28 — 34.1% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.21
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1536 103.4 -0.19 -2.75 0.551 39.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.23
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1529 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1551 101.3 -0.84 -3.20 0.696 42.8% +18 — — 30.0% -2.30 1–1 — — +0.06
Career — 2145 166.5 +5.96 +1.15 1.225 53.8% -10 +27 -119 66.1% +1.33 90–58 (61%) 69–58 (54%) 101.5 -0.38 — 1695 120.6 -1.12 -2.14 0.882 47.4% -8 +26 +69 41.4% -0.76 19–26 (42%) 13–13 (50%) 100.2 -0.70

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.