H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Pierce vs Iroda Tulyaganova H2H: 1-1
Mary Pierce and Iroda Tulyaganova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Iroda Tulyaganova leads 1–0 on clay, while Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iroda Tulyaganova won the 2001 Strasbourg third round 3-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 44
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2001* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Iroda Tulyaganova | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2001* | Dubai | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Mary Pierce | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Iroda Tulyaganova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
| Iroda Tulyaganova | #862 | #16 | 1,349 | 1,820 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Pierce | Iroda Tulyaganova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #75 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #20 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #50 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #550 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 | 2006 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #131 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |