H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Iva Majoli H2H: 7-4

Mary Pierce holds a 7–4 lead over Iva Majoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 4–2 on clay, while they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1998 Amelia Island quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.

FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
7 4
11 main draw meetings
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 11, 1998* Amelia Island WTA 250 QF Clay Mary Pierce #6 6-3 6-2 Iva Majoli #8 Match data
May 17, 1997* Berlin WTA 1000 QF Clay Mary Pierce #11 6-1 6-4 Iva Majoli #9 Match data
May 3, 1997* Hamburg WTA 250 QF Clay Iva Majoli #9 2-6 6-4 6-4 Mary Pierce #15 Match data
Apr 12, 1997* Amelia Island WTA 250 SF Clay Mary Pierce #15 2-6 7-5 7-6 Iva Majoli #9 Match data
Oct 14, 1995* Filderstadt WTA 250 QF Hard Iva Majoli #11 2-6 6-3 6-2 Mary Pierce #4 Match data
Oct 8, 1995* Zurich WTA 1000 F Hard Iva Majoli #13 6-4 6-4 Mary Pierce #4 Match data
Jun 6, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Iva Majoli #13 6-2 6-3 Mary Pierce #3 Match data
May 13, 1995* Rome WTA 1000 QF Clay Mary Pierce #3 6-4 2-6 7-6 Iva Majoli #14 Match data
Feb 19, 1995* Paris WTA 500 SF Hard Mary Pierce #3 6-3 6-4 Iva Majoli #12 Match data
Sep 6, 1994* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Mary Pierce #5 6-1 6-2 Iva Majoli #23 Match data
Nov 11, 1993* Philadelphia WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Mary Pierce #15 6-0 7-5 Iva Majoli #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Iva Majoli #777 #4 3,406 2,157 259 190 57.7% 1 3 0 0 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Iva Majoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 1992 7–6 53.8% #50 1,624 0 0
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1993 13–13 50.0% #46 1,736 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1994 38–19 66.7% #13 1,922 0 0
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1995 29–12 70.7% #9 2,046 0 2
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1996 39–16 70.9% #8 2,040 0 4
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1997 43–21 67.2% #6 1,947 1 7
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1998 23–20 53.5% #25 1,828 1 7
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1999 5–11 31.2% #164 1,694 1 7
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 2000 11–10 52.4% #62 1,703 1 7
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 2001 20–22 47.6% #44 1,697 1 7
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 2002 23–22 51.1% #32 1,668 1 8
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 2003 7–15 31.8% #131 1,589 1 8
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 2004 1–3 25.0% #321 1,564 1 8
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18