H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 2-1

Mary Pierce holds a 2–1 lead over Iveta Benesova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Iveta Benesova won the 2006 Australian Open second round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Iveta Benesova
CZE Age 43 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 19, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Iveta Benesova #42 6-3 7-5 Mary Pierce #5 Match data
Feb 17, 2005* Antwerp WTA 500 R32 Hard Mary Pierce #32 6-2 6-1 Iveta Benesova #34 Match data
Oct 31, 2003* Quebec City WTA 250 R16 Carpet Mary Pierce #36 6-4 7-6(3) Iveta Benesova #148 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Iveta Benesova #671 #25 1,811 1,760 177 221 44.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Iveta Benesova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 — — — — — — —
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 — — — — — — —
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 2002 6–9 40.0% #82 1,565 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 2003 9–19 32.1% #132 1,478 0 0
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 2004 25–19 56.8% #36 1,657 0 1
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 2005 21–27 43.8% #55 1,613 0 1
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 2006 17–21 44.7% #58 1,594 0 1
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 2007 6–14 30.0% #116 1,522 0 1
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 2008 20–17 54.1% #43 1,641 0 1
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 2009 29–25 53.7% #38 1,646 0 1
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 2010 18–24 42.9% #59 1,636 0 2
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2011 16–24 40.0% #54 1,650 0 2
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 2012 10–17 37.0% #81 1,587 0 2
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 — — — — — — —
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 2014 0–5 0.0% #671 1,526 0 2