H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 1-5

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 5–1 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 3–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1998 Canadian Open second round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 19, 1998* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R64 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #67 6-1 6-1 Mary Pierce #13 Match data
May 18, 1997* Berlin WTA 1000 F Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #14 6-4 6-2 Mary Pierce #11 Match data
Apr 13, 1996* Amelia Island WTA 250 SF Clay Mary Pierce #14 6-2 6-4 Mary Joe Fernandez #13 Match data
May 7, 1993* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #6 7-6(3) 7-6(3) Mary Pierce #16 Match data
Sep 8, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-0 6-4 Mary Pierce #16 Match data
May 31, 1990* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #8 6-4 6-4 Mary Pierce #180 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 — — — — — — —
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 — — — — — — —
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 — — — — — — —