H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mashona Washington vs Iva Majoli H2H: 0-1
Iva Majoli holds a 1–0 lead over Mashona Washington in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iva Majoli leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iva Majoli won the 2001 Toronto second round 6-1 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2001 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Iva Majoli | 6-1 4-6 7-5 | Mashona Washington | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mashona Washington | #990 | #50 | 676 | 1,647 | 42 | 76 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mashona Washington | Iva Majoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 |
| 23 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #130 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 2000 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 |
| 26 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #199 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #73 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #230 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #364 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |