H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mashona Washington vs Jane Chi H2H: 0-1

Jane Chi holds a 1–0 lead over Mashona Washington in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jane Chi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jane Chi won the 1999 Oklahoma round of 16 7-6 6-3.

USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jane Chi #82 7-6 6-3 Mashona Washington #185 Match data Feb 26, 1999* R16 Oklahoma Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mashona Washington #990 #50 676 1,645 42 76 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jane Chi #967 #62 440 1,585 14 21 40.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mashona Washington Jane Chi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1994 0–1 0.0% #407 1,499 0 0
19 1993 0–1 0.0% 1,493 0 0
22 1998 1–3 25.0% #165 1,493 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #155 1,496 0 0
23 1999 4–5 44.4% #130 1,506 0 0 1997 1–3 25.0% #244 1,485 0 0
24 2000 3–9 25.0% #142 1,481 0 0 1998 3–1 75.0% #84 1,539 0 0
25 2001 1–2 33.3% #134 1,489 0 0 1999 9–13 40.9% #106 1,521 0 0
26 2002 1–5 16.7% #109 1,470 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #285 1,493 0 0
27 2003 1–5 16.7% #199 1,441 0 0
28 2004 13–12 52.0% #53 1,581 0 0
29 2005 13–22 37.1% #73 1,586 0 0
30 2006 5–10 33.3% #230 1,578 0 0
32 2008 0–1 0.0% #309 1,562 0 0
34 2010 0–1 0.0% #364 1,538 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mashona Washington Jane Chi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1994 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1998 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 3 1 4 75.0%
25 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 8 8 16 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2003 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2004 11 10 21 52.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2005 5 14 19 26.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7%
30 2006 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 2008 0 1 1 0.0%
34 2010 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 28 52 80 35.0% 4 12 16 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 10 14 24 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mashona Washington Jane Chi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1994 1500 110.4 0.0% -5.00 -0.19
19 1993 1493 100.8 0.0% -4.00 -0.14
22 1998 1494 104.5 +27 33.3% -1.11 0–1 1–1 +0.08 1996 1497 97.2 40.0% -1.60 1–0 +0.42
23 1999 1506 104.0 +24 47.4% -0.53 0–1 1–1 +0.76 1997 1485 106.6 +46 25.0% -0.75 0–1 -0.07
24 2000 1481 104.4 +34 26.9% -2.00 1–1 3–0 (100%) +0.23 1998 1539 118.1 +39 77.8% +2.11 0–1 +0.41
25 2001 1489 110.4 +28 42.9% -0.86 0–1 -0.08 1999 1521 108.0 +69 -6 37.5% -0.90 4–2 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 101.5 +2.07
26 2002 1470 104.3 +40 23.1% -1.85 0–1 1–1 -0.30 2000 1494 93.7 0.0% -4.25 +0.14
27 2003 1441 96.8 +23 26.7% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.24
28 2004 1581 124.4 -0.46 +0.14 0.897 47.0% -15 51.8% +0.25 3–3 (50%) 1–0 +0.41
29 2005 1586 116.5 +0.23 -0.86 0.949 48.9% -73 -83 +76 37.8% -0.89 7–5 (58%) 6–4 (60%) 107.0 -0.35
30 2006 1579 111.3 +0.23 -2.15 0.876 47.1% -56 -69 +67 38.9% -1.14 2–4 (33%) 1–1 -1.40
32 2008 1563 98.4 -1.32 -4.37 0.692 42.4% 0.0% -3.00 +0.01
34 2010 1539 98.5 -1.16 -3.20 0.911 48.5% 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.25
Career 1646 117.0 +0.07 -1.67 0.899 47.7% -13 -78 +74 38.5% -0.92 14–20 (41%) 15–9 (63%) 104.1 -0.29 1585 109.2 +61 -6 38.2% -0.83 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 100.6 +8.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.